Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
TRS Stand 20472 pair #381710811
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
7.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n058.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Secret_06_TRS
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
2.74584794044 seconds
cpu usage
6.814925369
max memory
3.43003136E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
5086
starexec-result
YES
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QDP (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 89 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 30 ms] (8) QDP (9) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: c(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> b(c(c(c(c(y)))), x) c(c(b(c(y), 0))) -> a(0, c(c(a(y, 0)))) c(c(a(a(y, 0), x))) -> c(y) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(c(c(c(y)))) C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(c(c(y))) C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(c(y)) C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(y) C(c(b(c(y), 0))) -> C(c(a(y, 0))) C(c(b(c(y), 0))) -> C(a(y, 0)) C(c(a(a(y, 0), x))) -> C(y) The TRS R consists of the following rules: c(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> b(c(c(c(c(y)))), x) c(c(b(c(y), 0))) -> a(0, c(c(a(y, 0)))) c(c(a(a(y, 0), x))) -> c(y) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(c(c(y))) C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(c(c(c(y)))) C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(c(y)) C(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> C(y) C(c(b(c(y), 0))) -> C(c(a(y, 0))) C(c(a(a(y, 0), x))) -> C(y) The TRS R consists of the following rules: c(c(c(a(x, y)))) -> b(c(c(c(c(y)))), x) c(c(b(c(y), 0))) -> a(0, c(c(a(y, 0)))) c(c(a(a(y, 0), x))) -> c(y) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to TRS Stand 20472