details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	jwcime2.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n045.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	2.13311100006 seconds
cpu usage	5.166531165
max memory	3.21212416E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	8355
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) Overlay + Local Confluence [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) QDP (9) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) QDP (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) QDP (13) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (14) QDP (15) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) QDP (17) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) QDP (19) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (20) QDP (21) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (22) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(y, a)) -> f(f(f(f(a, a), y), h(a)), x) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT) The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(y, a)) -> f(f(f(f(a, a), y), h(a)), x) The set Q consists of the following terms: f(x0, f(x1, a)) ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: F(x, f(y, a)) -> F(f(f(f(a, a), y), h(a)), x) F(x, f(y, a)) -> F(f(f(a, a), y), h(a)) F(x, f(y, a)) -> F(f(a, a), y) F(x, f(y, a)) -> F(a, a) The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(y, a)) -> f(f(f(f(a, a), y), h(a)), x) The set Q consists of the following terms: f(x0, f(x1, a)) We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Stand 20472