TRS Stand 20472 pair #381712059

details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	07.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n110.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Der95

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	2.57238698006 seconds
cpu usage	6.800344968
max memory	5.29555456E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	5975
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) QTRS
(1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) QTRS
(3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(4) QDP
(5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) AND
    (7) QDP
        (8) MNOCProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (9) QDP
        (10) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (11) QDP
        (12) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (13) QDP
        (14) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (15) YES
    (16) QDP
        (17) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (18) QDP
        (19) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (20) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   w(r(x)) -> r(w(x))
   b(r(x)) -> r(b(x))
   b(w(x)) -> w(b(x))

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT)
We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE].
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   r(w(x)) -> w(r(x))
   r(b(x)) -> b(r(x))
   w(b(x)) -> b(w(x))

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

   R(w(x)) -> W(r(x))
   R(w(x)) -> R(x)
   R(b(x)) -> R(x)
   W(b(x)) -> W(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   r(w(x)) -> w(r(x))
   r(b(x)) -> b(r(x))
   w(b(x)) -> b(w(x))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
----------------------------------------

(6)
Complex Obligation (AND)

----------------------------------------

popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions all output return to TRS Stand 20472