details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	test76.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n013.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Strategy_removed_mixed_05

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	2.54595518112 seconds
cpu usage	6.332403599
max memory	5.33929984E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	5186
starexec-result	NO

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QDP (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) AND (5) QDP (6) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (7) QDP (8) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (9) YES (10) QDP (11) NonTerminationLoopProof [COMPLETE, 609 ms] (12) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: +(X, 0) -> X +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y)) f(0, s(0), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X) g(X, Y) -> X g(X, Y) -> Y Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: +^1(X, s(Y)) -> +^1(X, Y) F(0, s(0), X) -> F(X, +(X, X), X) F(0, s(0), X) -> +^1(X, X) The TRS R consists of the following rules: +(X, 0) -> X +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y)) f(0, s(0), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X) g(X, Y) -> X g(X, Y) -> Y Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: +^1(X, s(Y)) -> +^1(X, Y) The TRS R consists of the following rules: +(X, 0) -> X +(X, s(Y)) -> s(+(X, Y)) f(0, s(0), X) -> f(X, +(X, X), X) g(X, Y) -> X g(X, Y) -> Y Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT) We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R. popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Stand 20472