details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	perfect.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n079.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Mixed_TRS

run statistics

property	value
solver	Wanda
configuration	FirstOrder
runtime (wallclock)	0.108453989029 seconds
cpu usage	0.089369275
max memory	6262784.0

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	4227
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_FirstOrder /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES We consider the system theBenchmark. We are asked to determine termination of the following first-order TRS. 0 : [] --> o f : [o * o * o * o] --> o false : [] --> o if : [o * o * o] --> o le : [o * o] --> o minus : [o * o] --> o perfectp : [o] --> o s : [o] --> o true : [] --> o perfectp(0) => false perfectp(s(X)) => f(X, s(0), s(X), s(X)) f(0, X, 0, Y) => true f(0, X, s(Y), Z) => false f(s(X), 0, Y, Z) => f(X, Z, minus(Y, s(X)), Z) f(s(X), s(Y), Z, U) => if(le(X, Y), f(s(X), minus(Y, X), Z, U), f(X, U, Z, U)) As the system is orthogonal, it is terminating if it is innermost terminating by [Gra95]. Then, by [FuhGieParSchSwi11], it suffices to prove (innermost) termination of the typed system, with sort annotations chosen to respect the rules, as follows: 0 : [] --> bc f : [bc * bc * bc * bc] --> kc false : [] --> kc if : [wb * kc * kc] --> kc le : [bc * bc] --> wb minus : [bc * bc] --> bc perfectp : [bc] --> kc s : [bc] --> bc true : [] --> kc We use the dependency pair framework as described in [Kop12, Ch. 6/7], with static dependency pairs (see [KusIsoSakBla09] and the adaptation for AFSMs in [Kop12, Ch. 7.8]). We thus obtain the following dependency pair problem (P_0, R_0, minimal, formative): Dependency Pairs P_0: 0] perfectp#(s(X)) =#> f#(X, s(0), s(X), s(X)) 1] f#(s(X), 0, Y, Z) =#> f#(X, Z, minus(Y, s(X)), Z) 2] f#(s(X), s(Y), Z, U) =#> f#(s(X), minus(Y, X), Z, U) 3] f#(s(X), s(Y), Z, U) =#> f#(X, U, Z, U) Rules R_0: perfectp(0) => false perfectp(s(X)) => f(X, s(0), s(X), s(X)) f(0, X, 0, Y) => true f(0, X, s(Y), Z) => false f(s(X), 0, Y, Z) => f(X, Z, minus(Y, s(X)), Z) f(s(X), s(Y), Z, U) => if(le(X, Y), f(s(X), minus(Y, X), Z, U), f(X, U, Z, U)) Thus, the original system is terminating if (P_0, R_0, minimal, formative) is finite. We consider the dependency pair problem (P_0, R_0, minimal, formative). We place the elements of P in a dependency graph approximation G (see e.g. [Kop12, Thm. 7.27, 7.29], as follows: * 0 : 2, 3 * 1 : 1, 2, 3 * 2 : * 3 : 1, 2, 3 This graph has the following strongly connected components: P_1: f#(s(X), 0, Y, Z) =#> f#(X, Z, minus(Y, s(X)), Z) f#(s(X), s(Y), Z, U) =#> f#(X, U, Z, U) By [Kop12, Thm. 7.31], we may replace any dependency pair problem (P_0, R_0, m, f) by (P_1, R_0, m, f). Thus, the original system is terminating if (P_1, R_0, minimal, formative) is finite. We consider the dependency pair problem (P_1, R_0, minimal, formative). We apply the subterm criterion with the following projection function: nu(f#) = 1 Thus, we can orient the dependency pairs as follows: nu(f#(s(X), 0, Y, Z)) = s(X) |> X = nu(f#(X, Z, minus(Y, s(X)), Z)) nu(f#(s(X), s(Y), Z, U)) = s(X) |> X = nu(f#(X, U, Z, U)) By [Kop12, Thm. 7.35], we may replace a dependency pair problem (P_1, R_0, minimal, f) by ({}, R_0, minimal, f). By the empty set processor [Kop12, Thm. 7.15] this problem may be immediately removed. As all dependency pair problems were succesfully simplified with sound (and complete) processors until nothing remained, we conclude termination. +++ Citations +++ popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Stand 20472