details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	05.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n087.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Bouchare_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	3.58184099197 seconds
cpu usage	10.288625878
max memory	1.01982208E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	4294
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 16 ms] (2) QDP (3) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 125 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 37 ms] (6) QDP (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(b(b(x1))) -> a(x1) a(a(x1)) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(b(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(b(b(x1))) -> A(x1) A(a(x1)) -> B(b(b(x1))) A(a(x1)) -> B(b(x1)) A(a(x1)) -> B(x1) B(b(a(x1))) -> A(b(a(x1))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(b(b(x1))) -> a(x1) a(a(x1)) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(b(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. A(b(b(x1))) -> A(x1) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: <<< POL(A(x_1)) = [[-I]] + [[0A, -I, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(b(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [-I]] + [[0A, 0A, 1A], [-I, 0A, 0A], [0A, -I, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(a(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [-I]] + [[1A, 0A, 1A], [0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, -I, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(B(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-I, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: a(a(x1)) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(b(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) a(b(b(x1))) -> a(x1) ---------------------------------------- popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Stand 10685