details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-461.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n074.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	11.1924490929 seconds
cpu usage	40.034775412
max memory	4.021379072E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	6395
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 9 ms] (2) QDP (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 3 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 126 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 52 ms] (8) QDP (9) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) QDP (11) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) QDP (13) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (14) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) b(b(x1)) -> x1 c(c(b(x1))) -> a(b(c(c(x1)))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(x1) -> B(c(x1)) A(x1) -> C(x1) C(c(b(x1))) -> A(b(c(c(x1)))) C(c(b(x1))) -> B(c(c(x1))) C(c(b(x1))) -> C(c(x1)) C(c(b(x1))) -> C(x1) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) b(b(x1)) -> x1 c(c(b(x1))) -> a(b(c(c(x1)))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(x1) -> C(x1) C(c(b(x1))) -> A(b(c(c(x1)))) C(c(b(x1))) -> C(c(x1)) C(c(b(x1))) -> C(x1) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) b(b(x1)) -> x1 c(c(b(x1))) -> a(b(c(c(x1)))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Stand 10685