Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
SRS Stand 10685 pair #381719379
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
size-12-alpha-3-num-564.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n026.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Waldmann_07_size12
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
22.1800780296 seconds
cpu usage
85.513157843
max memory
5.154246656E9
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
3114
starexec-result
NO
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 3923 ms] (2) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(b(x1)) -> x1 a(c(x1)) -> c(c(b(b(x1)))) b(c(x1)) -> a(a(x1)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: "b c c c c -> c c b c c c c b b c b b b b b b b" b c c c c -> c c b c c c c b b c b b b b b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b c c a c c b b b b b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b c c b c c b b b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b c c b b c b c b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b c c b b c b b c b b c b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b a c c b b c b b c b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b a a c c b b c b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b a a a c c b b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b a a a a c b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c c c -> c c b a a b c c b by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c c -> c c b a a b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c -> c c b b c b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c -> a c c b b by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)"""b c c -> c c b by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c c -> c c b b c b b by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c c -> a c c b b by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""b c b b -> by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c b -> a by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> by original rule (OC 1)"""""b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)"""b c b b -> by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c b -> a by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> by original rule (OC 1)""""b c b c -> c c b b by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c b -> a by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)""""b c c -> a c c b b by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)""""a c -> c c b b by original rule (OC 1)" ---------------------------------------- (2) NO
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to SRS Stand 10685