details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-522.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n041.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	39.1264529228 seconds
cpu usage	151.628570122
max memory	5.706391552E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	2861
starexec-result	NO

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 5128 ms] (2) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(b(x1))) -> a(c(c(a(a(a(x1)))))) a(c(x1)) -> b(x1) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: "a a b a b c b c -> b c b c b c a b c a a b a b c b c a a a" a a b a b c b c -> b c b c b c a b c a a b a b c b c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b c b c -> b c b c b c a b c a a b a b c a c c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b a b c -> b c b c b c a b c a a b a a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b c -> b c b c b c a a a b c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b c -> b c b c a a b b c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b a b c -> b c b c a a b a a b by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b c -> b c a a b c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b -> b c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b c -> b c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b c -> a c c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b c -> b c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b c -> a c c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b -> b c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b -> b c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b c -> b c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b c -> a c c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b c -> b c a c c a a a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b c -> b c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b c -> a c c a a b by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)"""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b -> a c c a a a by original rule (OC 1)""""a c -> b by original rule (OC 1)" ---------------------------------------- (2) NO popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Stand 10685