details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	96224.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n054.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	ICFP_2010

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	3.40667200089 seconds
cpu usage	10.64256565
max memory	1.151721472E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	6195
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 93 ms] (2) QTRS (3) Overlay + Local Confluence [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QTRS (5) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 1 ms] (6) QDP (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(1(2(2(3(0(4(4(x1)))))))) -> 0(4(5(0(3(4(0(4(x1)))))))) 0(2(2(2(0(5(2(5(4(x1))))))))) -> 0(0(0(3(4(3(0(1(0(x1))))))))) 2(1(1(3(4(3(1(1(5(x1))))))))) -> 1(0(2(3(1(0(5(1(5(x1))))))))) 5(4(0(4(3(3(1(2(5(3(0(x1))))))))))) -> 5(5(2(5(3(1(5(0(3(5(2(x1))))))))))) 2(4(5(0(1(1(3(3(5(3(0(0(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(4(2(2(1(0(4(0(1(3(2(0(x1)))))))))))) 4(4(3(0(3(1(5(3(5(1(3(1(5(3(x1)))))))))))))) -> 0(2(4(5(0(0(0(5(1(0(5(4(4(x1))))))))))))) 2(2(0(0(2(1(0(5(3(2(2(1(4(0(5(x1))))))))))))))) -> 0(0(3(5(3(0(4(3(1(3(0(2(5(5(x1)))))))))))))) 3(0(0(4(2(5(5(1(3(0(2(3(3(5(1(4(5(x1))))))))))))))))) -> 3(4(0(1(0(5(5(3(1(4(0(3(5(3(2(2(5(x1))))))))))))))))) 5(1(1(4(1(5(3(0(4(3(2(5(4(1(3(3(5(x1))))))))))))))))) -> 5(0(1(0(4(0(2(4(5(1(5(4(1(5(3(3(5(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(1(4(4(3(2(0(4(1(4(3(4(4(1(5(3(4(4(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(4(2(3(1(0(1(1(1(3(0(2(4(4(1(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 1(1(4(1(0(1(0(3(3(4(4(1(5(4(0(4(4(5(5(3(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 1(3(0(3(2(2(4(4(2(0(3(3(4(0(3(0(4(3(4(0(x1)))))))))))))))))))) 2(0(3(3(3(4(1(1(0(4(4(0(3(3(3(0(0(1(5(3(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 5(3(3(1(4(0(4(5(4(4(4(2(4(3(1(1(1(5(4(x1))))))))))))))))))) 2(3(3(2(1(5(0(5(0(1(3(3(2(5(1(5(0(3(0(5(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 3(4(0(2(5(5(2(4(2(4(3(1(1(4(4(5(5(3(5(x1))))))))))))))))))) 3(3(2(2(3(3(4(0(0(0(2(5(0(5(3(0(0(1(1(4(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 3(1(1(0(3(3(5(4(2(2(1(0(1(1(0(5(0(3(4(0(x1)))))))))))))))))))) 4(2(4(1(0(5(0(4(1(0(3(0(2(5(4(3(5(3(5(3(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 4(2(5(4(4(2(4(5(0(0(3(1(5(0(2(0(2(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0(x_1)) = 104 + x_1 POL(1(x_1)) = 131 + x_1 POL(2(x_1)) = 126 + x_1 POL(3(x_1)) = 164 + x_1 POL(4(x_1)) = 138 + x_1 POL(5(x_1)) = 139 + x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 0(1(2(2(3(0(4(4(x1)))))))) -> 0(4(5(0(3(4(0(4(x1)))))))) 0(2(2(2(0(5(2(5(4(x1))))))))) -> 0(0(0(3(4(3(0(1(0(x1))))))))) 2(1(1(3(4(3(1(1(5(x1))))))))) -> 1(0(2(3(1(0(5(1(5(x1))))))))) 5(4(0(4(3(3(1(2(5(3(0(x1))))))))))) -> 5(5(2(5(3(1(5(0(3(5(2(x1))))))))))) 2(4(5(0(1(1(3(3(5(3(0(0(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(4(2(2(1(0(4(0(1(3(2(0(x1)))))))))))) 4(4(3(0(3(1(5(3(5(1(3(1(5(3(x1)))))))))))))) -> 0(2(4(5(0(0(0(5(1(0(5(4(4(x1))))))))))))) 2(2(0(0(2(1(0(5(3(2(2(1(4(0(5(x1))))))))))))))) -> 0(0(3(5(3(0(4(3(1(3(0(2(5(5(x1)))))))))))))) 5(1(1(4(1(5(3(0(4(3(2(5(4(1(3(3(5(x1))))))))))))))))) -> 5(0(1(0(4(0(2(4(5(1(5(4(1(5(3(3(5(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(1(4(4(3(2(0(4(1(4(3(4(4(1(5(3(4(4(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(4(2(3(1(0(1(1(1(3(0(2(4(4(1(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 1(1(4(1(0(1(0(3(3(4(4(1(5(4(0(4(4(5(5(3(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 1(3(0(3(2(2(4(4(2(0(3(3(4(0(3(0(4(3(4(0(x1)))))))))))))))))))) 2(0(3(3(3(4(1(1(0(4(4(0(3(3(3(0(0(1(5(3(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 5(3(3(1(4(0(4(5(4(4(4(2(4(3(1(1(1(5(4(x1))))))))))))))))))) 2(3(3(2(1(5(0(5(0(1(3(3(2(5(1(5(0(3(0(5(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 3(4(0(2(5(5(2(4(2(4(3(1(1(4(4(5(5(3(5(x1))))))))))))))))))) 3(3(2(2(3(3(4(0(0(0(2(5(0(5(3(0(0(1(1(4(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 3(1(1(0(3(3(5(4(2(2(1(0(1(1(0(5(0(3(4(0(x1)))))))))))))))))))) 4(2(4(1(0(5(0(4(1(0(3(0(2(5(4(3(5(3(5(3(x1)))))))))))))))))))) -> 4(2(5(4(4(2(4(5(0(0(3(1(5(0(2(0(2(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3(0(0(4(2(5(5(1(3(0(2(3(3(5(1(4(5(x1))))))))))))))))) -> 3(4(0(1(0(5(5(3(1(4(0(3(5(3(2(2(5(x1))))))))))))))))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT) The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Stand 10685