Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
HRS union beta 16688 pair #381734884
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Applicative_first_order_05__#3.57.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n006.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Uncurried_Applicative_11
run statistics
property
value
solver
Wanda
configuration
HigherOrder
runtime (wallclock)
1.21083188057 seconds
cpu usage
2.84736079
max memory
1.76922624E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
30302
starexec-result
YES
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_HigherOrder /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES We consider the system theBenchmark. Alphabet: 0 : [] --> b app : [c * c] --> c cons : [b * c] --> c false : [] --> a filter : [b -> a * c] --> c filter2 : [a * b -> a * b * c] --> c map : [b -> b * c] --> c minus : [b * b] --> b nil : [] --> c plus : [b * b] --> b quot : [b * b] --> b s : [b] --> b sum : [c] --> c true : [] --> a Rules: minus(x, 0) => x minus(s(x), s(y)) => minus(x, y) minus(minus(x, y), z) => minus(x, plus(y, z)) quot(0, s(x)) => 0 quot(s(x), s(y)) => s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) plus(0, x) => x plus(s(x), y) => s(plus(x, y)) app(nil, x) => x app(x, nil) => x app(cons(x, y), z) => cons(x, app(y, z)) sum(cons(x, nil)) => cons(x, nil) sum(cons(x, cons(y, z))) => sum(cons(plus(x, y), z)) sum(app(x, cons(y, cons(z, u)))) => sum(app(x, sum(cons(y, cons(z, u))))) map(f, nil) => nil map(f, cons(x, y)) => cons(f x, map(f, y)) filter(f, nil) => nil filter(f, cons(x, y)) => filter2(f x, f, x, y) filter2(true, f, x, y) => cons(x, filter(f, y)) filter2(false, f, x, y) => filter(f, y) This AFS is converted to an AFSM simply by replacing all free variables by meta-variables (with arity 0). We observe that the rules contain a first-order subset: minus(X, 0) => X minus(s(X), s(Y)) => minus(X, Y) minus(minus(X, Y), Z) => minus(X, plus(Y, Z)) quot(0, s(X)) => 0 quot(s(X), s(Y)) => s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) plus(0, X) => X plus(s(X), Y) => s(plus(X, Y)) app(nil, X) => X app(X, nil) => X app(cons(X, Y), Z) => cons(X, app(Y, Z)) sum(cons(X, nil)) => cons(X, nil) sum(cons(X, cons(Y, Z))) => sum(cons(plus(X, Y), Z)) sum(app(X, cons(Y, cons(Z, U)))) => sum(app(X, sum(cons(Y, cons(Z, U))))) Moreover, the system is finitely branching. Thus, by [Kop12, Thm. 7.55], we may omit all first-order dependency pairs from the dependency pair problem (DP(R), R) if this first-order part is Ce-terminating when seen as a many-sorted first-order TRS. According to the external first-order termination prover, this system is indeed Ce-terminating: || proof of resources/system.trs || # AProVE Commit ID: d84c10301d352dfd14de2104819581f4682260f5 fuhs 20130616 || || || Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: || || (0) QTRS || (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT] || (2) QDP || (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT] || (4) AND || (5) QDP || (6) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT] || (7) QDP || (8) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT] || (9) YES || (10) QDP || (11) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT] || (12) QDP || (13) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT] || (14) YES || (15) QDP || (16) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT] || (17) QDP || (18) MNOCProof [EQUIVALENT] || (19) QDP || (20) UsableRulesReductionPairsProof [EQUIVALENT] || (21) QDP || (22) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT] || (23) YES
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to HRS union beta 16688