Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Compl Integ Trans Syste 26843 pair #381744067
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex1.koat
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n096.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
PLDI10
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
2.84488511086 seconds
cpu usage
6.330482262
max memory
3.124224E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
64668
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^2), O(n^2))
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^2), O(n^2)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^2, n^2). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 449 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, n^2) (3) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 1072 ms] (4) BOUNDS(n^2, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: evalEx1start(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1entryin(A, B, C, D)) :|: TRUE evalEx1entryin(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb6in(0, A, C, D)) :|: TRUE evalEx1bb6in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bbin(A, B, C, D)) :|: B >= A + 1 evalEx1bb6in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1returnin(A, B, C, D)) :|: A >= B evalEx1bbin(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, A + 1, B)) :|: TRUE evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D)) :|: D >= C + 1 evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb5in(A, B, C, D)) :|: C >= D evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C, D - 1)) :|: 0 >= E + 1 evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C, D - 1)) :|: 0 >= E + 1 && E >= 1 evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C, D - 1)) :|: E >= 1 evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C, D)) :|: 0 >= 1 evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C + 1, D - 1)) :|: 0 >= 1 evalEx1bb1in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(A, B, C + 1, D)) :|: TRUE evalEx1bb5in(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb6in(A + 1, D, C, D)) :|: TRUE evalEx1returnin(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(evalEx1stop(A, B, C, D)) :|: TRUE The start-symbols are:[evalEx1start_4] ---------------------------------------- (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) YES(?, 22*ar_0 + 24*ar_0^2 + 14) Initial complexity problem: 1: T: (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1entryin(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1entryin(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb6in(0, ar_0, ar_2, ar_3)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bbin(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1returnin(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bbin(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_0 + 1, ar_1)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_3 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 1)) [ 0 >= e + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 1)) [ 0 >= e + 1 /\ e >= 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 1)) [ e >= 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 >= 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3 - 1)) [ 0 >= 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1bb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb6in(ar_0 + 1, ar_3, ar_2, ar_3)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalEx1returnin(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1stop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transitions from problem 1: evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 1)) [ 0 >= e + 1 /\ e >= 1 ] evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 >= 1 ] evalEx1bb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalEx1bb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3 - 1)) [ 0 >= 1 ]
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Compl Integ Trans Syste 26843