details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	poly4.koat
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n106.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	VMCAI05

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	2.70107412338 seconds
cpu usage	5.822369479
max memory	2.80563712E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	9344
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, max(1, 1 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1) + nat(2 * Arg_2 + -2 * Arg_3) + nat(Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1)). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Koat2 Proof [FINISHED, 804 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, max(1, 1 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1) + nat(2 * Arg_2 + -2 * Arg_3) + nat(Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1)) (3) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 990 ms] (4) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: eval(A, B, C, D, E) -> Com_1(eval(A, B + 1, C, D, E + 1)) :|: A >= B + 1 && C >= D + 1 eval(A, B, C, D, E) -> Com_1(eval(A, B, C, D + 1, E + 1)) :|: A >= B + 1 && C >= D + 1 eval(A, B, C, D, E) -> Com_1(eval(A, B, C, D + 1, E + 1)) :|: B >= A && C >= D + 1 eval(A, B, C, D, E) -> Com_1(eval(A, B + 1, C, D, E + 1)) :|: A >= B + 1 && D >= C start(A, B, C, D, E) -> Com_1(eval(A, B, C, D, E)) :|: TRUE The start-symbols are:[start_5] ---------------------------------------- (1) Koat2 Proof (FINISHED) YES( ?, 1+max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1])+max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3])+max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3])+max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)}) Initial Complexity Problem: Start: start Program_Vars: Arg_0, Arg_1, Arg_2, Arg_3, Arg_4 Temp_Vars: Locations: eval, start Transitions: eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1+1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4+1):|:Arg_1+1 <= Arg_0 && Arg_3+1 <= Arg_2 eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3+1,Arg_4+1):|:Arg_1+1 <= Arg_0 && Arg_3+1 <= Arg_2 eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3+1,Arg_4+1):|:Arg_0 <= Arg_1 && Arg_3+1 <= Arg_2 eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1+1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4+1):|:Arg_1+1 <= Arg_0 && Arg_2 <= Arg_3 start(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1,Arg_2,Arg_3,Arg_4):|: Timebounds: Overall timebound: 1+max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1])+max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3])+max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3])+max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 0: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 1: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3]) {O(n)} 2: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3]) {O(n)} 3: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 4: start->eval: 1 {O(1)} Costbounds: Overall costbound: 1+max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1])+max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3])+max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3])+max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 0: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 1: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3]) {O(n)} 2: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_2-Arg_3]) {O(n)} 3: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 4: start->eval: 1 {O(1)} Sizebounds: `Lower: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Compl Integ Trans Syste 26843