details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	division.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n037.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Rubio_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	291.914711952 seconds
cpu usage	306.016483412
max memory	5.42128128E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	3857
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: le(0, Y) -> true le(s(X), 0) -> false le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y) minus(0, Y) -> 0 minus(s(X), Y) -> ifMinus(le(s(X), Y), s(X), Y) ifMinus(true, s(X), Y) -> 0 ifMinus(false, s(X), Y) -> s(minus(X, Y)) quot(0, s(Y)) -> 0 quot(s(X), s(Y)) -> s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: le(0, Y) -> true le(s(X), 0) -> false le(s(X), s(Y)) -> le(X, Y) minus(0, Y) -> 0 minus(s(X), Y) -> ifMinus(le(s(X), Y), s(X), Y) ifMinus(true, s(X), Y) -> 0 ifMinus(false, s(X), Y) -> s(minus(X, Y)) quot(0, s(Y)) -> 0 quot(s(X), s(Y)) -> s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence le(s(X), s(Y)) ->^+ le(X, Y) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position []. The pumping substitution is [X / s(X), Y / s(Y)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127