details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	ex3.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n033.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Strategy_removed_mixed_05

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	1.6045999527 seconds
cpu usage	3.448794649
max memory	1.83861248E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	1878
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (4) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(g(a)) -> f(s(g(b))) f(f(x)) -> b g(x) -> f(g(x)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(g(a)) -> f(s(g(b))) f(f(x)) -> b g(x) -> f(g(x)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) InfiniteLowerBoundProof (FINISHED) The following loop proves infinite runtime complexity: The rewrite sequence g(x) ->^+ f(g(x)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [ ]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) BOUNDS(INF, INF) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127