Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127 pair #381902558
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
tpa06.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n074.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Secret_06_TRS
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
291.461008072 seconds
cpu usage
315.853890232
max memory
5.488144384E9
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
4111
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: min(0, y) -> 0 min(x, 0) -> 0 min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) max(0, y) -> y max(x, 0) -> x max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) p(s(x)) -> x f(s(x), s(y), s(z)) -> f(max(s(x), max(s(y), s(z))), p(min(s(x), max(s(y), s(z)))), min(s(x), min(s(y), s(z)))) f(0, y, z) -> max(y, z) f(x, 0, z) -> max(x, z) f(x, y, 0) -> max(x, y) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: min(0, y) -> 0 min(x, 0) -> 0 min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y)) max(0, y) -> y max(x, 0) -> x max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y)) p(s(x)) -> x f(s(x), s(y), s(z)) -> f(max(s(x), max(s(y), s(z))), p(min(s(x), max(s(y), s(z)))), min(s(x), min(s(y), s(z)))) f(0, y, z) -> max(y, z) f(x, 0, z) -> max(x, z) f(x, y, 0) -> max(x, y) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence min(s(x), s(y)) ->^+ s(min(x, y)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [x / s(x), y / s(y)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ----------------------------------------
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127