Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127 pair #381902642
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex3_2_Luc97.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n042.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Strategy_removed_CSR_05
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
1.50951385498 seconds
cpu usage
3.28369651
max memory
2.12819968E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
4347
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (10) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: dbl(0) -> 0 dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) dbls(nil) -> nil dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)) sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, Z) indx(nil, X) -> nil indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)) from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: dbl(0) -> 0 dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) dbls(nil) -> nil dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)) sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, Z) indx(nil, X) -> nil indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(sel(X, Z), indx(Y, Z)) from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence dbls(cons(X, Y)) ->^+ cons(dbl(X), dbls(Y)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [1]. The pumping substitution is [Y / cons(X, Y)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127