Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127 pair #381902761
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
thiemann40.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n072.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
AProVE_07
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
292.030835152 seconds
cpu usage
311.545583078
max memory
5.505376256E9
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
3701
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 38 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: nonZero(0) -> false nonZero(s(x)) -> true p(0) -> 0 p(s(x)) -> x id_inc(x) -> x id_inc(x) -> s(x) random(x) -> rand(x, 0) rand(x, y) -> if(nonZero(x), x, y) if(false, x, y) -> y if(true, x, y) -> rand(p(x), id_inc(y)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: nonZero(0) -> false nonZero(s(x)) -> true p(0) -> 0 p(s(x)) -> x id_inc(x) -> x id_inc(x) -> s(x) random(x) -> rand(x, 0) rand(x, y) -> if(nonZero(x), x, y) if(false, x, y) -> y if(true, x, y) -> rand(p(x), id_inc(y)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence rand(s(x1_0), y) ->^+ rand(x1_0, id_inc(y)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position []. The pumping substitution is [x1_0 / s(x1_0)]. The result substitution is [y / id_inc(y)]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127