details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	#4.34.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n072.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Strategy_removed_AG01

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	292.001834869 seconds
cpu usage	300.910817847
max memory	5.186060288E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	3401
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0) -> true f(1) -> false f(s(x)) -> f(x) if(true, x, y) -> x if(false, x, y) -> y g(s(x), s(y)) -> if(f(x), s(x), s(y)) g(x, c(y)) -> g(x, g(s(c(y)), y)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0) -> true f(1) -> false f(s(x)) -> f(x) if(true, x, y) -> x if(false, x, y) -> y g(s(x), s(y)) -> if(f(x), s(x), s(y)) g(x, c(y)) -> g(x, g(s(c(y)), y)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence g(x, c(y)) ->^+ g(x, g(s(c(y)), y)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [1]. The pumping substitution is [y / c(y)]. The result substitution is [x / s(c(y))]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127