details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	LengthOfFiniteLists_complete_Z.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n036.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	291.447846889 seconds
cpu usage	313.035192202
max memory	5.908504576E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	11339
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 191 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, V1) -> U12(isNatList(activate(V1))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1) -> U22(isNat(activate(V1))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isNatList(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isNatList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isNat(n__0) -> tt isNat(n__length(V1)) -> U11(isNatIListKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNat(n__s(V1)) -> U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNatIList(V) -> U31(isNatIListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNatIList(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatIListKind(n__nil) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatKind(n__0) -> tt isNatKind(n__length(V1)) -> isNatIListKind(activate(V1)) isNatKind(n__s(V1)) -> isNatKind(activate(V1)) isNatList(n__nil) -> tt isNatList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U61(and(and(isNatList(activate(L)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(L))), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), activate(L)) zeros -> n__zeros 0 -> n__0 length(X) -> n__length(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) isNatIListKind(X) -> n__isNatIListKind(X) nil -> n__nil and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isNatKind(X) -> n__isNatKind(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__length(X)) -> length(X) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) activate(n__isNatIListKind(X)) -> isNatIListKind(X) activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(X1, X2) activate(n__isNatKind(X)) -> isNatKind(X) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127