details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	ExIntrod_GM01_Z.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n039.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	1.99395895004 seconds
cpu usage	5.149500815
max memory	5.13794048E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	5115
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 192 ms] (10) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: incr(nil) -> nil incr(cons(X, L)) -> cons(s(X), n__incr(activate(L))) adx(nil) -> nil adx(cons(X, L)) -> incr(cons(X, n__adx(activate(L)))) nats -> adx(zeros) zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) head(cons(X, L)) -> X tail(cons(X, L)) -> activate(L) incr(X) -> n__incr(X) adx(X) -> n__adx(X) zeros -> n__zeros activate(n__incr(X)) -> incr(X) activate(n__adx(X)) -> adx(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: incr(nil) -> nil incr(cons(X, L)) -> cons(s(X), n__incr(activate(L))) adx(nil) -> nil adx(cons(X, L)) -> incr(cons(X, n__adx(activate(L)))) nats -> adx(zeros) zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) head(cons(X, L)) -> X tail(cons(X, L)) -> activate(L) incr(X) -> n__incr(X) adx(X) -> n__adx(X) zeros -> n__zeros activate(n__incr(X)) -> incr(X) activate(n__adx(X)) -> adx(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence activate(n__incr(cons(X1_0, L2_0))) ->^+ cons(s(X1_0), n__incr(activate(L2_0))) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [1,0]. The pumping substitution is [L2_0 / n__incr(cons(X1_0, L2_0))]. The result substitution is [ ]. popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127