Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127 pair #381903432

details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex4_4_Luc96b_L.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	tct 2018-07-13
configuration	tct_rc
runtime (wallclock)	0.0144219398499 seconds
cpu usage	0.021465155
max memory	2772992.0

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	2595
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
    + Details:
        The system has following decreasing Loops:
          f(x){x -> g(x)} =
            f(g(x)) ->^+ f(x)
              = C[f(x) = f(x){}]

** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
** Step 1.b:2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          f_0(2) -> 1
          f_1(2) -> 1
          g_0(2) -> 2
** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(g(X)) -> f(X)
        - Signature:
            {f/1} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))

popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127