details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	MYNAT_nosorts_noand_GM.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n074.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	2.32634997368 seconds
cpu usage	6.124496041
max memory	6.54061568E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	7235
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) DecreasingLoopProof [FINISHED, 498 ms] (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__U11(tt, M, N) -> a__U12(tt, M, N) a__U12(tt, M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) a__U21(tt, M, N) -> a__U22(tt, M, N) a__U22(tt, M, N) -> a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N)) a__plus(N, 0) -> mark(N) a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U11(tt, M, N) a__x(N, 0) -> 0 a__x(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(tt, M, N) mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(x(X1, X2)) -> a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(tt) -> tt mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) mark(0) -> 0 a__U11(X1, X2, X3) -> U11(X1, X2, X3) a__U12(X1, X2, X3) -> U12(X1, X2, X3) a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) a__U22(X1, X2, X3) -> U22(X1, X2, X3) a__x(X1, X2) -> x(X1, X2) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__U11(tt, M, N) -> a__U12(tt, M, N) a__U12(tt, M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) a__U21(tt, M, N) -> a__U22(tt, M, N) a__U22(tt, M, N) -> a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N)) a__plus(N, 0) -> mark(N) a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U11(tt, M, N) a__x(N, 0) -> 0 a__x(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(tt, M, N) mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(x(X1, X2)) -> a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(tt) -> tt mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) mark(0) -> 0 a__U11(X1, X2, X3) -> U11(X1, X2, X3) a__U12(X1, X2, X3) -> U12(X1, X2, X3) a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) a__U22(X1, X2, X3) -> U22(X1, X2, X3) a__x(X1, X2) -> x(X1, X2) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127