details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex4_7_15_Bor03_FR.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	1.73677515984 seconds
cpu usage	4.127479804
max memory	2.67423744E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	5786
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof [FINISHED, 99 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0) -> cons(0, n__f(n__s(n__0))) f(s(0)) -> f(p(s(0))) p(s(0)) -> 0 f(X) -> n__f(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) 0 -> n__0 activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0) -> cons(0, n__f(n__s(n__0))) f(s(0)) -> f(p(s(0))) p(s(0)) -> 0 f(X) -> n__f(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) 0 -> n__0 activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof (FINISHED) A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match-Bound[TAB_LEFTLINEAR,TAB_NONLEFTLINEAR] (for contructor-based start-terms) of 4. The compatible tree automaton used to show the Match-Boundedness (for constructor-based start-terms) is represented by: final states : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] transitions: cons0(0, 0) -> 0 n__f0(0) -> 0 n__s0(0) -> 0 n__00() -> 0 f0(0) -> 1 p0(0) -> 2 s0(0) -> 3 00() -> 4 activate0(0) -> 5 n__f1(0) -> 1 n__s1(0) -> 3 n__01() -> 4 activate1(0) -> 6 f1(6) -> 5 activate1(0) -> 7 s1(7) -> 5 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127