Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127 pair #381903711
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex4_7_37_Bor03_FR.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n056.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Transformed_CSR_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
1.61337304115 seconds
cpu usage
3.586903096
max memory
2.33652224E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
6156
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) DecreasingLoopProof [FINISHED, 29 ms] (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS)) minus(X, 0) -> 0 minus(s(X), s(Y)) -> minus(X, Y) quot(0, s(Y)) -> 0 quot(s(X), s(Y)) -> s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) zWquot(XS, nil) -> nil zWquot(nil, XS) -> nil zWquot(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) -> cons(quot(X, Y), n__zWquot(activate(XS), activate(YS))) from(X) -> n__from(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) zWquot(X1, X2) -> n__zWquot(X1, X2) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__zWquot(X1, X2)) -> zWquot(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, activate(XS)) minus(X, 0) -> 0 minus(s(X), s(Y)) -> minus(X, Y) quot(0, s(Y)) -> 0 quot(s(X), s(Y)) -> s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) zWquot(XS, nil) -> nil zWquot(nil, XS) -> nil zWquot(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) -> cons(quot(X, Y), n__zWquot(activate(XS), activate(YS))) from(X) -> n__from(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) zWquot(X1, X2) -> n__zWquot(X1, X2) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__zWquot(X1, X2)) -> zWquot(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence activate(n__zWquot(X1, X2)) ->^+ zWquot(activate(X1), activate(X2)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127