details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex18_Luc06_GM.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n028.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	1.52206897736 seconds
cpu usage	3.14717664
max memory	2.19594752E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	4458
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__f(f(a)) -> a__f(g(f(a))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(a) -> a mark(g(X)) -> g(X) a__f(X) -> f(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__f(f(a)) -> a__f(g(f(a))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(a) -> a mark(g(X)) -> g(X) a__f(X) -> f(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (FINISHED) A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 3. The certificate found is represented by the following graph. "[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] {(1,2,[a__f_1|0, mark_1|0, f_1|1, a|1, g_1|1]), (1,3,[a__f_1|1, f_1|2]), (1,6,[a__f_1|1, f_1|2]), (1,7,[a__f_1|2, f_1|3]), (2,2,[f_1|0, a|0, g_1|0]), (3,4,[g_1|1]), (4,5,[f_1|1]), (5,2,[a|1]), (6,2,[mark_1|1, a|1, g_1|1]), (6,6,[a__f_1|1, f_1|2]), (6,7,[a__f_1|2, f_1|3]), (7,8,[g_1|2]), (8,9,[f_1|2]), (9,2,[a|2])}" ---------------------------------------- (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__f(f(a)) -> a__f(g(f(a))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(a) -> a mark(g(X)) -> g(X) a__f(X) -> f(X) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127