details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex4_DLMMU04_GM.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n070.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	9.96177816391 seconds
cpu usage	25.994747956
max memory	4.019617792E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	10767
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) DecreasingLoopProof [FINISHED, 6193 ms] (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__and(tt, T) -> mark(T) a__isNatIList(IL) -> a__isNatList(IL) a__isNat(0) -> tt a__isNat(s(N)) -> a__isNat(N) a__isNat(length(L)) -> a__isNatList(L) a__isNatIList(zeros) -> tt a__isNatIList(cons(N, IL)) -> a__and(a__isNat(N), a__isNatIList(IL)) a__isNatList(nil) -> tt a__isNatList(cons(N, L)) -> a__and(a__isNat(N), a__isNatList(L)) a__isNatList(take(N, IL)) -> a__and(a__isNat(N), a__isNatIList(IL)) a__zeros -> cons(0, zeros) a__take(0, IL) -> a__uTake1(a__isNatIList(IL)) a__uTake1(tt) -> nil a__take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> a__uTake2(a__and(a__isNat(M), a__and(a__isNat(N), a__isNatIList(IL))), M, N, IL) a__uTake2(tt, M, N, IL) -> cons(mark(N), take(M, IL)) a__length(cons(N, L)) -> a__uLength(a__and(a__isNat(N), a__isNatList(L)), L) a__uLength(tt, L) -> s(a__length(mark(L))) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(isNatIList(X)) -> a__isNatIList(X) mark(isNatList(X)) -> a__isNatList(X) mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) mark(length(X)) -> a__length(mark(X)) mark(zeros) -> a__zeros mark(take(X1, X2)) -> a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(uTake1(X)) -> a__uTake1(mark(X)) mark(uTake2(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> a__uTake2(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) mark(uLength(X1, X2)) -> a__uLength(mark(X1), X2) mark(tt) -> tt mark(0) -> 0 mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) mark(nil) -> nil a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) a__isNatIList(X) -> isNatIList(X) a__isNatList(X) -> isNatList(X) a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) a__length(X) -> length(X) a__zeros -> zeros a__take(X1, X2) -> take(X1, X2) a__uTake1(X) -> uTake1(X) a__uTake2(X1, X2, X3, X4) -> uTake2(X1, X2, X3, X4) a__uLength(X1, X2) -> uLength(X1, X2) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__and(tt, T) -> mark(T) a__isNatIList(IL) -> a__isNatList(IL) a__isNat(0) -> tt a__isNat(s(N)) -> a__isNat(N) a__isNat(length(L)) -> a__isNatList(L) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Full Rewri 10127