details

property	value
status	timeout (wallclock)
benchmark	jones5.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
space	Mixed_TRS

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	301.031806946 seconds
cpu usage	805.13864689
max memory	1.56014592E10

stage attributes

unavailable

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, empty) -> x f(empty, cons(a, k)) -> f(cons(a, k), k) f(cons(a, k), y) -> f(y, k) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, empty) -> x f(empty, cons(a, k)) -> f(cons(a, k), k) f(cons(a, k), y) -> f(y, k) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence f(cons(a, k), cons(a1_0, k2_0)) ->^+ f(k, k2_0) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position []. The pumping substitution is [k / cons(a, k), k2_0 / cons(a1_0, k2_0)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, empty) -> x f(empty, cons(a, k)) -> f(cons(a, k), k) f(cons(a, k), y) -> f(y, k) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807