details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	#3.52.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n041.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	AG01

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	4.60765790939 seconds
cpu usage	14.520419607
max memory	4.10529792E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	8763
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxWeightedTrs (3) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (4) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (5) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (7) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRNTS (9) CompleteCoflocoProof [FINISHED, 121 ms] (10) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (11) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (12) TRS for Loop Detection (13) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (14) BEST (15) proven lower bound (16) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (17) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (18) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0, 1, x) -> f(s(x), x, x) f(x, y, s(z)) -> s(f(0, 1, z)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) Transformed relative TRS to weighted TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxWeightedTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0, 1, x) -> f(s(x), x, x) [1] f(x, y, s(z)) -> s(f(0, 1, z)) [1] Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) Infered types. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS with Types. The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0, 1, x) -> f(s(x), x, x) [1] f(x, y, s(z)) -> s(f(0, 1, z)) [1] The TRS has the following type information: f :: 0:1:s -> 0:1:s -> 0:1:s -> 0:1:s 0 :: 0:1:s 1 :: 0:1:s s :: 0:1:s -> 0:1:s Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (5) CompletionProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) The TRS is a completely defined constructor system, as every type has a constant constructor and the following rules were added: f(v0, v1, v2) -> null_f [0] And the following fresh constants: null_f ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Runtime Complexity Weighted TRS where all functions are completely defined. The underlying TRS is: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807