Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807 pair #381904469
details
property
value
status
timeout (wallclock)
benchmark
ExProp7_Luc06_GM.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
space
Transformed_CSR_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
301.012224913 seconds
cpu usage
1148.65068176
max memory
1.5868854272E10
stage attributes
unavailable
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__f(0) -> cons(0, f(s(0))) a__f(s(0)) -> a__f(a__p(s(0))) a__p(s(X)) -> mark(X) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(0) -> 0 mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) a__f(X) -> f(X) a__p(X) -> p(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__f(0) -> cons(0, f(s(0))) a__f(s(0)) -> a__f(a__p(s(0))) a__p(s(X)) -> mark(X) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(0) -> 0 mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) a__f(X) -> f(X) a__p(X) -> p(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence mark(f(X)) ->^+ a__f(mark(X)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [X / f(X)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807