details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	eq.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n040.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Frederiksen_Others

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	2.25064110756 seconds
cpu usage	6.269550364
max memory	1.060712448E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	4294
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: eq0(S(x'), S(x)) -> eq0(x', x) eq0(S(x), 0) -> 0 eq0(0, S(x)) -> 0 eq0(0, 0) -> S(0) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: eq0(S(x'), S(x)) -> eq0(x', x) eq0(S(x), 0) -> 0 eq0(0, S(x)) -> 0 eq0(0, 0) -> S(0) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof (FINISHED) A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match-Bound[TAB_LEFTLINEAR,TAB_NONLEFTLINEAR] (for contructor-based start-terms) of 1. The compatible tree automaton used to show the Match-Boundedness (for constructor-based start-terms) is represented by: final states : [1] transitions: S0(0) -> 0 00() -> 0 eq00(0, 0) -> 1 eq01(0, 0) -> 1 01() -> 1 01() -> 2 S1(2) -> 1 ---------------------------------------- (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807