Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807 pair #381905005
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
game.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n077.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Frederiksen_Glenstrup
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
1.8756210804 seconds
cpu usage
3.957097948
max memory
2.78073344E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
6606
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof [FINISHED, 106 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: @(Cons(x, xs), ys) -> Cons(x, @(xs, ys)) @(Nil, ys) -> ys game(p1, Cons(x', xs'), Cons(Capture, xs)) -> game(Cons(x', p1), xs', xs) game(p1, p2, Cons(Swap, xs)) -> game(p2, p1, xs) equal(Capture, Capture) -> True equal(Capture, Swap) -> False equal(Swap, Capture) -> False equal(Swap, Swap) -> True game(p1, p2, Nil) -> @(p1, p2) goal(p1, p2, moves) -> game(p1, p2, moves) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: @(Cons(x, xs), ys) -> Cons(x, @(xs, ys)) @(Nil, ys) -> ys game(p1, Cons(x', xs'), Cons(Capture, xs)) -> game(Cons(x', p1), xs', xs) game(p1, p2, Cons(Swap, xs)) -> game(p2, p1, xs) equal(Capture, Capture) -> True equal(Capture, Swap) -> False equal(Swap, Capture) -> False equal(Swap, Swap) -> True game(p1, p2, Nil) -> @(p1, p2) goal(p1, p2, moves) -> game(p1, p2, moves) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof (FINISHED) A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match-Bound[TAB_LEFTLINEAR,TAB_NONLEFTLINEAR] (for contructor-based start-terms) of 2. The compatible tree automaton used to show the Match-Boundedness (for constructor-based start-terms) is represented by: final states : [1, 2, 3, 4] transitions: Cons0(0, 0) -> 0 Nil0() -> 0 Capture0() -> 0 Swap0() -> 0 True0() -> 0 False0() -> 0 @0(0, 0) -> 1 game0(0, 0, 0) -> 2 equal0(0, 0) -> 3 goal0(0, 0, 0) -> 4 @1(0, 0) -> 5 Cons1(0, 5) -> 1 Cons1(0, 0) -> 6 game1(6, 0, 0) -> 2 game1(0, 0, 0) -> 2 True1() -> 3
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807