details

property	value
status	timeout (wallclock)
benchmark	PEANO_nokinds_GM.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	301.008834124 seconds
cpu usage	1176.04521323
max memory	1.5469121536E10

stage attributes

unavailable

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__U11(tt, N) -> mark(N) a__U21(tt, M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) a__and(tt, X) -> mark(X) a__isNat(0) -> tt a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1) a__plus(N, 0) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N) a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) mark(tt) -> tt mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) mark(0) -> 0 a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__U11(tt, N) -> mark(N) a__U21(tt, M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M))) a__and(tt, X) -> mark(X) a__isNat(0) -> tt a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1) a__plus(N, 0) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N) a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X) mark(tt) -> tt mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) mark(0) -> 0 a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3) a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2) a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runti Compl Inner Rewri 22807