Logic Progr 19030 pair #381919700

details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	minus2.pl
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n040.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Schneider_Kamp_08

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	2.8692009449 seconds
cpu usage	8.362292309
max memory	7.02889984E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	71489
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Left Termination of the query pattern

m(g,g,a)

w.r.t. the given Prolog program could successfully be proven:

(0) Prolog
(1) BuiltinConflictTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) Prolog
(3) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof [SOUND, 34 ms]
(4) TRIPLES
(5) TriplesToPiDPProof [SOUND, 7 ms]
(6) PiDP
(7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) AND
    (9) PiDP
        (10) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (11) PiDP
        (12) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms]
        (13) QDP
        (14) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (15) YES
    (16) PiDP
        (17) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (18) PiDP
        (19) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 3 ms]
        (20) QDP
        (21) QDPQMonotonicMRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 21 ms]
        (22) QDP
        (23) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (24) TRUE


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Clauses:

m(X, 0, Z) :- ','(!, =(Z, X)).
m(0, Y, Z) :- ','(!, =(Z, 0)).
m(X, Y, Z) :- ','(p(X, A), ','(p(Y, B), m(A, B, Z))).
p(0, 0).
p(s(0), 0).
p(s(s(X)), s(Y)) :- p(s(X), Y).
=(X, X).


Query: m(g,g,a)
----------------------------------------

(1) BuiltinConflictTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT)
Renamed defined predicates conflicting with built-in predicates [PROLOG].
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Clauses:

m(X, 0, Z) :- ','(!, user_defined_=(Z, X)).
m(0, Y, Z) :- ','(!, user_defined_=(Z, 0)).
m(X, Y, Z) :- ','(p(X, A), ','(p(Y, B), m(A, B, Z))).
p(0, 0).
p(s(0), 0).
p(s(s(X)), s(Y)) :- p(s(X), Y).
user_defined_=(X, X).


Query: m(g,g,a)
----------------------------------------

(3) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND)
Built DT problem from termination graph DT10.

{
    "root": 2,
    "program": {
        "directives": [],
        "clauses": [
            [
                "(m X (0) Z)",
                "(',' (!) (user_defined_= Z X))"
            ],
            [
                "(m (0) Y Z)",
                "(',' (!) (user_defined_= Z (0)))"
            ],
            [
                "(m X Y Z)",

popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions all output return to Logic Progr 19030