Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Logic Progr 19030 pair #381919839
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
reach.pl
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n071.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
terminweb_old
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
2.96328091621 seconds
cpu usage
8.339649313
max memory
5.05663488E8
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
39306
starexec-result
YES
output
/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Left Termination of the query pattern reach(g,g,g,g) w.r.t. the given Prolog program could successfully be proven: (0) Prolog (1) PrologToPiTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (2) PiTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 20 ms] (4) PiDP (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) AND (7) PiDP (8) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (9) PiDP (10) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (11) QDP (12) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (13) YES (14) PiDP (15) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) PiDP (17) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (18) QDP (19) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (20) YES (21) PiDP (22) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (23) PiDP (24) PiDPToQDPProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (25) QDP (26) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (27) YES (28) PiDP (29) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (30) PiDP (31) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 2 ms] (32) QDP (33) QDPQMonotonicMRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 33 ms] (34) QDP (35) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (36) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Clauses: reach(X, Y, Edges, Not_Visited) :- member(.(X, .(Y, [])), Edges). reach(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited) :- ','(member(.(X, .(Y, [])), Edges), ','(member(Y, Not_Visited), ','(delete(Y, Not_Visited, V1), reach(Y, Z, Edges, V1)))). member(H, .(H, L)). member(X, .(H, L)) :- member(X, L). delete(X, .(X, Y), Y). delete(X, .(H, T1), .(H, T2)) :- delete(X, T1, T2). Query: reach(g,g,g,g) ---------------------------------------- (1) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND) We use the technique of [TOCL09]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes: reach_in_4: (b,b,b,b) member_in_2: (b,b) (f,b) delete_in_3: (b,b,f) Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System: Pi-finite rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: reach_in_gggg(X, Y, Edges, Not_Visited) -> U1_gggg(X, Y, Edges, Not_Visited, member_in_gg(.(X, .(Y, [])), Edges)) member_in_gg(H, .(H, L)) -> member_out_gg(H, .(H, L)) member_in_gg(X, .(H, L)) -> U6_gg(X, H, L, member_in_gg(X, L)) U6_gg(X, H, L, member_out_gg(X, L)) -> member_out_gg(X, .(H, L)) U1_gggg(X, Y, Edges, Not_Visited, member_out_gg(.(X, .(Y, [])), Edges)) -> reach_out_gggg(X, Y, Edges, Not_Visited) reach_in_gggg(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited) -> U2_gggg(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited, member_in_ag(.(X, .(Y, [])), Edges)) member_in_ag(H, .(H, L)) -> member_out_ag(H, .(H, L)) member_in_ag(X, .(H, L)) -> U6_ag(X, H, L, member_in_ag(X, L)) U6_ag(X, H, L, member_out_ag(X, L)) -> member_out_ag(X, .(H, L)) U2_gggg(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited, member_out_ag(.(X, .(Y, [])), Edges)) -> U3_gggg(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited, Y, member_in_gg(Y, Not_Visited)) U3_gggg(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited, Y, member_out_gg(Y, Not_Visited)) -> U4_gggg(X, Z, Edges, Not_Visited, Y, delete_in_gga(Y, Not_Visited, V1)) delete_in_gga(X, .(X, Y), Y) -> delete_out_gga(X, .(X, Y), Y) delete_in_gga(X, .(H, T1), .(H, T2)) -> U7_gga(X, H, T1, T2, delete_in_gga(X, T1, T2))
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Logic Progr 19030