Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Complexity_C_Integer 2019-03-21 04.38 pair #429989074
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
svcomp_b.09_assume.c
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n153.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Adapted_from_Stroeder_15
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
c_complexity
runtime (wallclock)
1.38495 seconds
cpu usage
2.2996
user time
2.11854
system time
0.181059
max virtual memory
1.8273644E7
max residence set size
180784.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(?, O(n^2))
output
2.12/1.35 WORST_CASE(?, O(n^2)) 2.12/1.36 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat 2.12/1.36 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^2). 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (0) CpxIntTrs 2.12/1.36 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 75 ms] 2.12/1.36 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^2) 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 ---------------------------------------- 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (0) 2.12/1.36 Obligation: 2.12/1.36 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_start(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_x, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_y > 0 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_y <= 0 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 > 0 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 <= 0 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_y, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 > v_y 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01 - 1, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 <= v_y 2.12/1.36 eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.01, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_4] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 ---------------------------------------- 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 2.12/1.36 YES(?, 4*ar_0^2 + 4*ar_0*ar_2 + 4*ar_2 + 2*ar_0 + 7) 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 Initial complexity problem: 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 1: T: 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_2, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= 1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_0, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 start location: koat_start 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 leaf cost: 0 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2: T: 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_2, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= 1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_0, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 start location: koat_start 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 leaf cost: 0 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 A polynomial rank function with 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 Pol(evalfoostart) = 2 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = 2 2.12/1.36 2.12/1.36 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = 2 2.12/1.36
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Complexity_C_Integer 2019-03-21 04.38