Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Complexity_C_Integer 2019-03-21 04.38 pair #429989444
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
svcomp_c.08.c
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n090.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Adapted_from_Stroeder_15
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
c_complexity
runtime (wallclock)
1.39842 seconds
cpu usage
2.36317
user time
2.16191
system time
0.201256
max virtual memory
1.8380564E7
max residence set size
181828.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(?, O(n^2))
output
2.26/1.35 WORST_CASE(?, O(n^2)) 2.26/1.36 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat 2.26/1.36 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^2). 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (0) CpxIntTrs 2.26/1.36 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 76 ms] 2.26/1.36 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^2) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 ---------------------------------------- 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (0) 2.26/1.36 Obligation: 2.26/1.36 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_start(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_i, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, 0, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.01 >= 0 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.01 < 0 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.02 <= v_.01 - 1 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.02 > v_.01 - 1 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02 + 1, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01 - 1, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE 2.26/1.36 eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_5] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 ---------------------------------------- 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 2.26/1.36 YES(?, 49*ar_1 + 6*ar_1^2 + 49) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 Initial complexity problem: 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 1: T: 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_0 >= 0 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 start location: koat_start 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 leaf cost: 0 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2: T: 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_0 >= 0 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 start location: koat_start 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 leaf cost: 0 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 A polynomial rank function with 2.26/1.36 2.26/1.36 Pol(evalfoostart) = 2
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Complexity_C_Integer 2019-03-21 04.38