details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	perfectg.c.koat
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n088.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Flores-Montoya_16

run statistics

property	value
solver	CoFloCo 2018
configuration	its
runtime (wallclock)	0.865935 seconds
cpu usage	0.785349
user time	0.75932
system time	0.026029
max virtual memory	316252.0
max residence set size	13076.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))

output

0.71/0.76 WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 Preprocessing Cost Relations 0.71/0.76 ===================================== 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 #### Computed strongly connected components 0.71/0.76 0. recursive : [eval_perfectg_bb3_in/4,eval_perfectg_bb5_in/4] 0.71/0.76 1. recursive : [eval_perfectg_10/14,eval_perfectg_9/14,eval_perfectg_bb1_in/14,eval_perfectg_bb3_in_loop_cont/15,eval_perfectg_bb4_in/14] 0.71/0.76 2. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_stop/9] 0.71/0.76 3. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_bb2_in/9] 0.71/0.76 4. non_recursive : [exit_location/1] 0.71/0.76 5. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_bb1_in_loop_cont/10] 0.71/0.76 6. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_3/9] 0.71/0.76 7. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_2/9] 0.71/0.76 8. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_1/9] 0.71/0.76 9. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_bb0_in/9] 0.71/0.76 10. non_recursive : [eval_perfectg_start/9] 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 #### Obtained direct recursion through partial evaluation 0.71/0.76 0. SCC is partially evaluated into eval_perfectg_bb3_in/4 0.71/0.76 1. SCC is partially evaluated into eval_perfectg_bb1_in/14 0.71/0.76 2. SCC is completely evaluated into other SCCs 0.71/0.76 3. SCC is partially evaluated into eval_perfectg_bb2_in/9 0.71/0.76 4. SCC is completely evaluated into other SCCs 0.71/0.76 5. SCC is partially evaluated into eval_perfectg_bb1_in_loop_cont/10 0.71/0.76 6. SCC is partially evaluated into eval_perfectg_3/9 0.71/0.76 7. SCC is completely evaluated into other SCCs 0.71/0.76 8. SCC is completely evaluated into other SCCs 0.71/0.76 9. SCC is completely evaluated into other SCCs 0.71/0.76 10. SCC is partially evaluated into eval_perfectg_start/9 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 Control-Flow Refinement of Cost Relations 0.71/0.76 ===================================== 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Specialization of cost equations eval_perfectg_bb3_in/4 0.71/0.76 * CE 21 is refined into CE [22] 0.71/0.76 * CE 20 is refined into CE [23] 0.71/0.76 * CE 19 is refined into CE [24] 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Cost equations --> "Loop" of eval_perfectg_bb3_in/4 0.71/0.76 * CEs [24] --> Loop 22 0.71/0.76 * CEs [22] --> Loop 23 0.71/0.76 * CEs [23] --> Loop 24 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Ranking functions of CR eval_perfectg_bb3_in(V_2,V_y2_1,B,C) 0.71/0.76 * RF of phase [22]: [-V_2+V_y2_1+1,V_y2_1] 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 #### Partial ranking functions of CR eval_perfectg_bb3_in(V_2,V_y2_1,B,C) 0.71/0.76 * Partial RF of phase [22]: 0.71/0.76 - RF of loop [22:1]: 0.71/0.76 -V_2+V_y2_1+1 0.71/0.76 V_y2_1 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Specialization of cost equations eval_perfectg_bb1_in/14 0.71/0.76 * CE 13 is refined into CE [25,26] 0.71/0.76 * CE 14 is discarded (unfeasible) 0.71/0.76 * CE 16 is refined into CE [27] 0.71/0.76 * CE 15 is refined into CE [28] 0.71/0.76 * CE 9 is refined into CE [29] 0.71/0.76 * CE 11 is discarded (unfeasible) 0.71/0.76 * CE 10 is discarded (unfeasible) 0.71/0.76 * CE 12 is discarded (unfeasible) 0.71/0.76 * CE 7 is refined into CE [30] 0.71/0.76 * CE 8 is discarded (unfeasible) 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Cost equations --> "Loop" of eval_perfectg_bb1_in/14 0.71/0.76 * CEs [29] --> Loop 25 0.71/0.76 * CEs [30] --> Loop 26 0.71/0.76 * CEs [25,26] --> Loop 27 0.71/0.76 * CEs [27] --> Loop 28 0.71/0.76 * CEs [28] --> Loop 29 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Ranking functions of CR eval_perfectg_bb1_in(V_2,V_8,V_x,V_y1_0,V_y2_1,V_y3_0,V_y3_2,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) 0.71/0.76 * RF of phase [25,26]: [V_y1_0-1] 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 #### Partial ranking functions of CR eval_perfectg_bb1_in(V_2,V_8,V_x,V_y1_0,V_y2_1,V_y3_0,V_y3_2,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) 0.71/0.76 * Partial RF of phase [25,26]: 0.71/0.76 - RF of loop [25:1]: 0.71/0.76 V_y1_0-2 0.71/0.76 - RF of loop [26:1]: 0.71/0.76 V_y1_0-1 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Specialization of cost equations eval_perfectg_bb2_in/9 0.71/0.76 * CE 5 is refined into CE [31] 0.71/0.76 * CE 4 is refined into CE [32] 0.71/0.76 * CE 6 is refined into CE [33] 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Cost equations --> "Loop" of eval_perfectg_bb2_in/9 0.71/0.76 * CEs [31] --> Loop 30 0.71/0.76 * CEs [32] --> Loop 31 0.71/0.76 * CEs [33] --> Loop 32 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 ### Ranking functions of CR eval_perfectg_bb2_in(V_0,V_2,V_8,V_x,V_y1_0,V_y2_1,V_y3_0,V_y3_2,B) 0.71/0.76 0.71/0.76 #### Partial ranking functions of CR eval_perfectg_bb2_in(V_0,V_2,V_8,V_x,V_y1_0,V_y2_1,V_y3_0,V_y3_2,B) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Complexity_ITS 2019-03-21 04.46