Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Complexity_ITS 2019-03-21 04.46 pair #429990560
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
fermat.koat
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n068.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
T2
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
1.81764 seconds
cpu usage
4.06273
user time
3.80821
system time
0.25452
max virtual memory
1.8343504E7
max residence set size
227544.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(?, O(1))
output
3.82/1.78 WORST_CASE(?, O(1)) 4.02/1.79 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat 4.02/1.79 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (0) CpxIntTrs 4.02/1.79 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 102 ms] 4.02/1.79 (2) BOUNDS(1, 1) 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 ---------------------------------------- 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (0) 4.02/1.79 Obligation: 4.02/1.79 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 4.02/1.79 f0(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f12(3, T, 3, 1, 0, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S)) :|: TRUE 4.02/1.79 f12(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f12(A, B, C, T, E + 1, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S)) :|: C >= E + 1 4.02/1.79 f24(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f24(A, B, C, D, E, F, G + 1, T, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S)) :|: F >= G + 1 4.02/1.79 f36(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f36(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J + 1, T, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S)) :|: I >= J + 1 4.02/1.79 f36(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f46(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, K, K, N, O, P, Q, R, S)) :|: J >= I 4.02/1.79 f24(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f36(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, A, 0, 1, L, M, H, H, T, Q, R, S)) :|: G >= F 4.02/1.79 f12(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S) -> Com_1(f24(A, B, C, D, E, A, 0, 1, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, D, D, T)) :|: E >= C 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 The start-symbols are:[f0_19] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 ---------------------------------------- 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 4.02/1.79 YES(?, 19) 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 Initial complexity problem: 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 1: T: 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f12(3, t, 3, 1, 0, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f12(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f12(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, t, ar_4 + 1, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6 + 1, t, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) [ ar_5 >= ar_6 + 1 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f36(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f36(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9 + 1, t, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) [ ar_8 >= ar_9 + 1 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f36(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f46(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_10, ar_10, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) [ ar_9 >= ar_8 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f36(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_0, 0, 1, ar_11, ar_12, ar_7, ar_7, t, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) [ ar_6 >= ar_5 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f12(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_0, 0, 1, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_3, ar_3, t)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_7, ar_8, ar_9, ar_10, ar_11, ar_12, ar_13, ar_14, ar_15, ar_16, ar_17, ar_18)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 start location: koat_start 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 leaf cost: 0 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 Slicing away variables that do not contribute to conditions from problem 1 leaves variables [ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9]. 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 We thus obtain the following problem: 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 2: T: 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f12(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_0, 0, ar_8, ar_9)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f24(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f36(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_0, 0)) [ ar_6 >= ar_5 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f36(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f46(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9)) [ ar_9 >= ar_8 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f36(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f36(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9 + 1)) [ ar_8 >= ar_9 + 1 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f24(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6 + 1, ar_8, ar_9)) [ ar_5 >= ar_6 + 1 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f12(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f12(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4 + 1, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f12(3, 3, 0, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9)) 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 start location: koat_start 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 leaf cost: 0 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 2 produces the following problem: 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 3: T: 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f12(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_0, 0, ar_8, ar_9)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f24(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f36(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_0, 0)) [ ar_6 >= ar_5 ] 4.02/1.79 4.02/1.79 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f36(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9) -> Com_1(f46(ar_0, ar_2, ar_4, ar_5, ar_6, ar_8, ar_9)) [ ar_9 >= ar_8 ]
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Complexity_ITS 2019-03-21 04.46