details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	15.koat
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n054.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Beerendonk

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	2.28383 seconds
cpu usage	4.44405
user time	4.21341
system time	0.230637
max virtual memory	1.861848E7
max residence set size	216672.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

4.30/2.25 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) 4.40/2.26 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat 4.40/2.26 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, max(1, 1 + Arg_1) + nat(Arg_0)). 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 (0) CpxIntTrs 4.40/2.26 (1) Koat2 Proof [FINISHED, 128 ms] 4.40/2.26 (2) BOUNDS(1, max(1, 1 + Arg_1) + nat(Arg_0)) 4.40/2.26 (3) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 609 ms] 4.40/2.26 (4) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 ---------------------------------------- 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 (0) 4.40/2.26 Obligation: 4.40/2.26 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 4.40/2.26 eval(A, B) -> Com_1(eval(A - 1, B)) :|: A + B >= 1 && A >= 1 4.40/2.26 eval(A, B) -> Com_1(eval(A, B - 1)) :|: A + B >= 1 && 0 >= A && B >= 1 4.40/2.26 eval(A, B) -> Com_1(eval(A, B)) :|: A + B >= 1 && 0 >= A && 0 >= B 4.40/2.26 start(A, B) -> Com_1(eval(A, B)) :|: TRUE 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 The start-symbols are:[start_2] 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 ---------------------------------------- 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 (1) Koat2 Proof (FINISHED) 4.40/2.26 YES( ?, 1+max([0, Arg_1])+max([0, Arg_0]) {O(n)}) 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Initial Complexity Problem: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Start: start 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Program_Vars: Arg_0, Arg_1 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Temp_Vars: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Locations: eval, start 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Transitions: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 eval(Arg_0,Arg_1) -> eval(Arg_0-1,Arg_1):|:1 <= Arg_0+Arg_1 && 1 <= Arg_0 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 eval(Arg_0,Arg_1) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1-1):|:1 <= Arg_0+Arg_1 && Arg_0 <= 0 && 1 <= Arg_1 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 start(Arg_0,Arg_1) -> eval(Arg_0,Arg_1):|: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Timebounds: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Overall timebound: 1+max([0, Arg_1])+max([0, Arg_0]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 0: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_0]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 1: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_1]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 3: start->eval: 1 {O(1)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Costbounds: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Overall costbound: 1+max([0, Arg_1])+max([0, Arg_0]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 0: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_0]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 1: eval->eval: max([0, Arg_1]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 3: start->eval: 1 {O(1)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 Sizebounds: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 `Lower: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 0: eval->eval, Arg_0: 0 {O(1)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 0: eval->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 1: eval->eval, Arg_0: min([0, Arg_0]) {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 1: eval->eval, Arg_1: 0 {O(1)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 3: start->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 3: start->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 `Upper: 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 0: eval->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 4.40/2.26 0: eval->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)} 4.40/2.26 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Complexity_ITS 2019-03-21 04.46