details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex14_Luc06_GM.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n170.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_innermost_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	1.92951 seconds
cpu usage	4.12895
user time	3.9424
system time	0.186554
max virtual memory	1.8409688E7
max residence set size	256672.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

3.94/1.89 YES 3.94/1.90 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 3.94/1.90 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 (0) QTRS 3.94/1.90 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 36 ms] 3.94/1.90 (2) QDP 3.94/1.90 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (4) QDP 3.94/1.90 (5) MRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (6) QDP 3.94/1.90 (7) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (8) QDP 3.94/1.90 (9) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (10) QDP 3.94/1.90 (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (12) QDP 3.94/1.90 (13) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (14) QDP 3.94/1.90 (15) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (16) QDP 3.94/1.90 (17) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (18) QDP 3.94/1.90 (19) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (20) QDP 3.94/1.90 (21) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (22) QDP 3.94/1.90 (23) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (24) QDP 3.94/1.90 (25) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (26) QDP 3.94/1.90 (27) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.94/1.90 (28) TRUE 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 ---------------------------------------- 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 (0) 3.94/1.90 Obligation: 3.94/1.90 Q restricted rewrite system: 3.94/1.90 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 a__h(X) -> a__g(mark(X), X) 3.94/1.90 a__g(a, X) -> a__f(b, X) 3.94/1.90 a__f(X, X) -> a__h(a__a) 3.94/1.90 a__a -> b 3.94/1.90 mark(h(X)) -> a__h(mark(X)) 3.94/1.90 mark(g(X1, X2)) -> a__g(mark(X1), X2) 3.94/1.90 mark(a) -> a__a 3.94/1.90 mark(f(X1, X2)) -> a__f(mark(X1), X2) 3.94/1.90 mark(b) -> b 3.94/1.90 a__h(X) -> h(X) 3.94/1.90 a__g(X1, X2) -> g(X1, X2) 3.94/1.90 a__a -> a 3.94/1.90 a__f(X1, X2) -> f(X1, X2) 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 The set Q consists of the following terms: 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 a__h(x0) 3.94/1.90 a__a 3.94/1.90 mark(h(x0)) 3.94/1.90 mark(g(x0, x1)) 3.94/1.90 mark(a) 3.94/1.90 mark(f(x0, x1)) 3.94/1.90 mark(b) 3.94/1.90 a__g(x0, x1) 3.94/1.90 a__f(x0, x1) 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 ---------------------------------------- 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 3.94/1.90 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 3.94/1.90 ---------------------------------------- 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 (2) 3.94/1.90 Obligation: 3.94/1.90 Q DP problem: 3.94/1.90 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 A__H(X) -> A__G(mark(X), X) 3.94/1.90 A__H(X) -> MARK(X) 3.94/1.90 A__G(a, X) -> A__F(b, X) 3.94/1.90 A__F(X, X) -> A__H(a__a) 3.94/1.90 A__F(X, X) -> A__A 3.94/1.90 MARK(h(X)) -> A__H(mark(X)) 3.94/1.90 MARK(h(X)) -> MARK(X) 3.94/1.90 MARK(g(X1, X2)) -> A__G(mark(X1), X2) 3.94/1.90 MARK(g(X1, X2)) -> MARK(X1) 3.94/1.90 MARK(a) -> A__A 3.94/1.90 MARK(f(X1, X2)) -> A__F(mark(X1), X2) 3.94/1.90 MARK(f(X1, X2)) -> MARK(X1) 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.94/1.90 3.94/1.90 a__h(X) -> a__g(mark(X), X) 3.94/1.90 a__g(a, X) -> a__f(b, X) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS_Innermost 2019-03-28 22.12