Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
TRS_Innermost 2019-03-28 22.12 pair #432271426
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
#4.32.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n151.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
AG01_innermost
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
1.72643 seconds
cpu usage
3.59855
user time
3.44588
system time
0.152679
max virtual memory
1.8408888E7
max residence set size
237236.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
YES
output
3.55/1.69 YES 3.55/1.70 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 3.55/1.70 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (0) QTRS 3.55/1.70 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (2) QDP 3.55/1.70 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (4) AND 3.55/1.70 (5) QDP 3.55/1.70 (6) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (7) QDP 3.55/1.70 (8) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (9) QDP 3.55/1.70 (10) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (11) YES 3.55/1.70 (12) QDP 3.55/1.70 (13) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (14) QDP 3.55/1.70 (15) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (16) QDP 3.55/1.70 (17) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.55/1.70 (18) YES 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 ---------------------------------------- 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (0) 3.55/1.70 Obligation: 3.55/1.70 Q restricted rewrite system: 3.55/1.70 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 f(x, c(y)) -> f(x, s(f(y, y))) 3.55/1.70 f(s(x), s(y)) -> f(x, s(c(s(y)))) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 The set Q consists of the following terms: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 f(x0, c(x1)) 3.55/1.70 f(s(x0), s(x1)) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 ---------------------------------------- 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 3.55/1.70 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 3.55/1.70 ---------------------------------------- 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (2) 3.55/1.70 Obligation: 3.55/1.70 Q DP problem: 3.55/1.70 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 F(x, c(y)) -> F(x, s(f(y, y))) 3.55/1.70 F(x, c(y)) -> F(y, y) 3.55/1.70 F(s(x), s(y)) -> F(x, s(c(s(y)))) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 f(x, c(y)) -> f(x, s(f(y, y))) 3.55/1.70 f(s(x), s(y)) -> f(x, s(c(s(y)))) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 The set Q consists of the following terms: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 f(x0, c(x1)) 3.55/1.70 f(s(x0), s(x1)) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 3.55/1.70 ---------------------------------------- 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 3.55/1.70 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node. 3.55/1.70 ---------------------------------------- 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (4) 3.55/1.70 Complex Obligation (AND) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 ---------------------------------------- 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 (5) 3.55/1.70 Obligation: 3.55/1.70 Q DP problem: 3.55/1.70 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 F(s(x), s(y)) -> F(x, s(c(s(y)))) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 f(x, c(y)) -> f(x, s(f(y, y))) 3.55/1.70 f(s(x), s(y)) -> f(x, s(c(s(y)))) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 The set Q consists of the following terms: 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 f(x0, c(x1)) 3.55/1.70 f(s(x0), s(x1)) 3.55/1.70 3.55/1.70 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 3.55/1.70 ----------------------------------------
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to TRS_Innermost 2019-03-28 22.12