details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	333.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n095.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	COPS

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	1.92351 seconds
cpu usage	3.75792
user time	3.5925
system time	0.165418
max virtual memory	1.8347108E7
max residence set size	233976.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

3.66/1.88 YES 3.66/1.89 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 3.66/1.89 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could be proven: 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 (0) CTRS 3.66/1.89 (1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] 3.66/1.89 (2) QTRS 3.66/1.89 (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 82 ms] 3.66/1.89 (4) QTRS 3.66/1.89 (5) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.66/1.89 (6) YES 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 ---------------------------------------- 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 (0) 3.66/1.89 Obligation: 3.66/1.89 Conditional term rewrite system: 3.66/1.89 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 h(a, a) -> i(b) 3.66/1.89 h(a, b) -> i(c) 3.66/1.89 h(b, b) -> i(d) 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules: 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 f(x) -> g(x, y, z) <= h(a, x) -> i(y), h(a, y) -> i(z) 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 ---------------------------------------- 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 (1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND) 3.66/1.89 The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC]. 3.66/1.89 ---------------------------------------- 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 (2) 3.66/1.89 Obligation: 3.66/1.89 Q restricted rewrite system: 3.66/1.89 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 f(x) -> U1(h(a, x), x) 3.66/1.89 U1(i(y), x) -> U2(h(a, y), x, y) 3.66/1.89 U2(i(z), x, y) -> g(x, y, z) 3.66/1.89 h(a, a) -> i(b) 3.66/1.89 h(a, b) -> i(c) 3.66/1.89 h(b, b) -> i(d) 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 Q is empty. 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 ---------------------------------------- 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 3.66/1.89 Used ordering: 3.66/1.89 f/1(YES) 3.66/1.89 U1/2(YES,YES) 3.66/1.89 h/2(YES,YES) 3.66/1.89 a/0) 3.66/1.89 i/1)YES( 3.66/1.89 U2/3(YES,YES,YES) 3.66/1.89 g/3(YES,YES,YES) 3.66/1.89 b/0) 3.66/1.89 c/0) 3.66/1.89 d/0) 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 Quasi precedence: 3.66/1.89 f_1 > U1_2 > [h_2, c, d] > b 3.66/1.89 f_1 > U1_2 > a 3.66/1.89 f_1 > U1_2 > U2_3 > g_3 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 Status: 3.66/1.89 f_1: multiset status 3.66/1.89 U1_2: multiset status 3.66/1.89 h_2: multiset status 3.66/1.89 a: multiset status 3.66/1.89 U2_3: multiset status 3.66/1.89 g_3: multiset status 3.66/1.89 b: multiset status 3.66/1.89 c: multiset status 3.66/1.89 d: multiset status 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 f(x) -> U1(h(a, x), x) 3.66/1.89 U1(i(y), x) -> U2(h(a, y), x, y) 3.66/1.89 U2(i(z), x, y) -> g(x, y, z) 3.66/1.89 h(a, a) -> i(b) 3.66/1.89 h(a, b) -> i(c) 3.66/1.89 h(b, b) -> i(d) 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 ---------------------------------------- 3.66/1.89 3.66/1.89 (4) 3.66/1.89 Obligation: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS_Conditional 2019-03-28 22.59