details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	java_Break.c.t2_fixed.smt2
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n053.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	From_T2

run statistics

property	value
solver	Ctrl
configuration	Transition
runtime (wallclock)	1.74102 seconds
cpu usage	1.71471
user time	0.916157
system time	0.798557
max virtual memory	130192.0
max residence set size	8680.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

1.66/1.74 YES 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 DP problem for innermost termination. 1.66/1.74 P = 1.66/1.74 f7#(x1, x2, x3) -> f6#(x1, x2, x3) 1.66/1.74 f6#(I0, I1, I2) -> f5#(I0, I1, I2) 1.66/1.74 f6#(I3, I4, I5) -> f2#(I3, I4, I5) 1.66/1.74 f6#(I6, I7, I8) -> f3#(I6, I7, I8) 1.66/1.74 f6#(I9, I10, I11) -> f1#(I9, I10, I11) 1.66/1.74 f6#(I15, I16, I17) -> f5#(I17, rnd2, rnd3) [rnd3 = rnd2 /\ rnd2 = rnd2] 1.66/1.74 f5#(I18, I19, I20) -> f2#(I20, I19, 0) 1.66/1.74 f2#(I21, I22, I23) -> f3#(I23, I22, I23) [11 <= I23] 1.66/1.74 f2#(I24, I25, I26) -> f1#(I26, I25, I26) [I26 <= 10] 1.66/1.74 f1#(I32, I33, I34) -> f2#(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 R = 1.66/1.74 f7(x1, x2, x3) -> f6(x1, x2, x3) 1.66/1.74 f6(I0, I1, I2) -> f5(I0, I1, I2) 1.66/1.74 f6(I3, I4, I5) -> f2(I3, I4, I5) 1.66/1.74 f6(I6, I7, I8) -> f3(I6, I7, I8) 1.66/1.74 f6(I9, I10, I11) -> f1(I9, I10, I11) 1.66/1.74 f6(I12, I13, I14) -> f4(I12, I13, I14) 1.66/1.74 f6(I15, I16, I17) -> f5(I17, rnd2, rnd3) [rnd3 = rnd2 /\ rnd2 = rnd2] 1.66/1.74 f5(I18, I19, I20) -> f2(I20, I19, 0) 1.66/1.74 f2(I21, I22, I23) -> f3(I23, I22, I23) [11 <= I23] 1.66/1.74 f2(I24, I25, I26) -> f1(I26, I25, I26) [I26 <= 10] 1.66/1.74 f3(I27, I28, I29) -> f4(I29, I30, I31) [I31 = I30 /\ I30 = I30] 1.66/1.74 f1(I32, I33, I34) -> f2(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 The dependency graph for this problem is: 1.66/1.74 0 -> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1.66/1.74 1 -> 6 1.66/1.74 2 -> 7, 8 1.66/1.74 3 -> 1.66/1.74 4 -> 9 1.66/1.74 5 -> 6 1.66/1.74 6 -> 8 1.66/1.74 7 -> 1.66/1.74 8 -> 9 1.66/1.74 9 -> 7, 8 1.66/1.74 Where: 1.66/1.74 0) f7#(x1, x2, x3) -> f6#(x1, x2, x3) 1.66/1.74 1) f6#(I0, I1, I2) -> f5#(I0, I1, I2) 1.66/1.74 2) f6#(I3, I4, I5) -> f2#(I3, I4, I5) 1.66/1.74 3) f6#(I6, I7, I8) -> f3#(I6, I7, I8) 1.66/1.74 4) f6#(I9, I10, I11) -> f1#(I9, I10, I11) 1.66/1.74 5) f6#(I15, I16, I17) -> f5#(I17, rnd2, rnd3) [rnd3 = rnd2 /\ rnd2 = rnd2] 1.66/1.74 6) f5#(I18, I19, I20) -> f2#(I20, I19, 0) 1.66/1.74 7) f2#(I21, I22, I23) -> f3#(I23, I22, I23) [11 <= I23] 1.66/1.74 8) f2#(I24, I25, I26) -> f1#(I26, I25, I26) [I26 <= 10] 1.66/1.74 9) f1#(I32, I33, I34) -> f2#(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 We have the following SCCs. 1.66/1.74 { 8, 9 } 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 DP problem for innermost termination. 1.66/1.74 P = 1.66/1.74 f2#(I24, I25, I26) -> f1#(I26, I25, I26) [I26 <= 10] 1.66/1.74 f1#(I32, I33, I34) -> f2#(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 R = 1.66/1.74 f7(x1, x2, x3) -> f6(x1, x2, x3) 1.66/1.74 f6(I0, I1, I2) -> f5(I0, I1, I2) 1.66/1.74 f6(I3, I4, I5) -> f2(I3, I4, I5) 1.66/1.74 f6(I6, I7, I8) -> f3(I6, I7, I8) 1.66/1.74 f6(I9, I10, I11) -> f1(I9, I10, I11) 1.66/1.74 f6(I12, I13, I14) -> f4(I12, I13, I14) 1.66/1.74 f6(I15, I16, I17) -> f5(I17, rnd2, rnd3) [rnd3 = rnd2 /\ rnd2 = rnd2] 1.66/1.74 f5(I18, I19, I20) -> f2(I20, I19, 0) 1.66/1.74 f2(I21, I22, I23) -> f3(I23, I22, I23) [11 <= I23] 1.66/1.74 f2(I24, I25, I26) -> f1(I26, I25, I26) [I26 <= 10] 1.66/1.74 f3(I27, I28, I29) -> f4(I29, I30, I31) [I31 = I30 /\ I30 = I30] 1.66/1.74 f1(I32, I33, I34) -> f2(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 We use the reverse value criterion with the projection function NU: 1.66/1.74 NU[f1#(z1,z2,z3)] = 10 + -1 * (1 + z3) 1.66/1.74 NU[f2#(z1,z2,z3)] = 10 + -1 * z3 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 This gives the following inequalities: 1.66/1.74 I26 <= 10 ==> 10 + -1 * I26 > 10 + -1 * (1 + I26) with 10 + -1 * I26 >= 0 1.66/1.74 ==> 10 + -1 * (1 + I34) >= 10 + -1 * (1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 We remove all the strictly oriented dependency pairs. 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 DP problem for innermost termination. 1.66/1.74 P = 1.66/1.74 f1#(I32, I33, I34) -> f2#(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 R = 1.66/1.74 f7(x1, x2, x3) -> f6(x1, x2, x3) 1.66/1.74 f6(I0, I1, I2) -> f5(I0, I1, I2) 1.66/1.74 f6(I3, I4, I5) -> f2(I3, I4, I5) 1.66/1.74 f6(I6, I7, I8) -> f3(I6, I7, I8) 1.66/1.74 f6(I9, I10, I11) -> f1(I9, I10, I11) 1.66/1.74 f6(I12, I13, I14) -> f4(I12, I13, I14) 1.66/1.74 f6(I15, I16, I17) -> f5(I17, rnd2, rnd3) [rnd3 = rnd2 /\ rnd2 = rnd2] 1.66/1.74 f5(I18, I19, I20) -> f2(I20, I19, 0) 1.66/1.74 f2(I21, I22, I23) -> f3(I23, I22, I23) [11 <= I23] 1.66/1.74 f2(I24, I25, I26) -> f1(I26, I25, I26) [I26 <= 10] 1.66/1.74 f3(I27, I28, I29) -> f4(I29, I30, I31) [I31 = I30 /\ I30 = I30] 1.66/1.74 f1(I32, I33, I34) -> f2(I34, I33, 1 + I34) 1.66/1.74 1.66/1.74 The dependency graph for this problem is: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Integer_Transition_Systems 2019-03-29 01.54