details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	213611.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n165.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	ICFP_2010

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	3.67344 seconds
cpu usage	11.2874
user time	10.56
system time	0.727423
max virtual memory	3.7773832E7
max residence set size	1649232.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

9.21/3.21 YES 9.62/3.26 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 9.62/3.26 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (0) QTRS 9.62/3.26 (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 145 ms] 9.62/3.26 (2) QTRS 9.62/3.26 (3) Overlay + Local Confluence [EQUIVALENT, 9 ms] 9.62/3.26 (4) QTRS 9.62/3.26 (5) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 15 ms] 9.62/3.26 (6) QDP 9.62/3.26 (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.62/3.26 (8) TRUE 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (0) 9.62/3.26 Obligation: 9.62/3.26 Q restricted rewrite system: 9.62/3.26 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 0(x1) -> 1(x1) 9.62/3.26 0(0(x1)) -> 0(x1) 9.62/3.26 3(4(5(x1))) -> 4(3(5(x1))) 9.62/3.26 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) -> 1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 9.62/3.26 1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) -> 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 Q is empty. 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 9.62/3.26 Used ordering: 9.62/3.26 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 POL(0(x_1)) = 72 + x_1 9.62/3.26 POL(1(x_1)) = 71 + x_1 9.62/3.26 POL(2(x_1)) = 333 + x_1 9.62/3.26 POL(3(x_1)) = x_1 9.62/3.26 POL(4(x_1)) = x_1 9.62/3.26 POL(5(x_1)) = x_1 9.62/3.26 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 0(x1) -> 1(x1) 9.62/3.26 0(0(x1)) -> 0(x1) 9.62/3.26 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) -> 1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 9.62/3.26 1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) -> 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (2) 9.62/3.26 Obligation: 9.62/3.26 Q restricted rewrite system: 9.62/3.26 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 3(4(5(x1))) -> 4(3(5(x1))) 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 Q is empty. 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (3) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT) 9.62/3.26 The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost. 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (4) 9.62/3.26 Obligation: 9.62/3.26 Q restricted rewrite system: 9.62/3.26 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 3(4(5(x1))) -> 4(3(5(x1))) 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 The set Q consists of the following terms: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 3(4(5(x0))) 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 9.62/3.26 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 9.62/3.26 ---------------------------------------- 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 (6) 9.62/3.26 Obligation: 9.62/3.26 Q DP problem: 9.62/3.26 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 3^1(4(5(x1))) -> 3^1(5(x1)) 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 9.62/3.26 9.62/3.26 3(4(5(x1))) -> 4(3(5(x1))) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29