Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29 pair #432289141
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
torpa3.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n048.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Secret_05_SRS
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
4.31557 seconds
cpu usage
13.5312
user time
12.9605
system time
0.570749
max virtual memory
3.8707672E7
max residence set size
1683456.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
YES
output
12.98/4.14 YES 13.21/4.17 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 13.21/4.17 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 (0) QTRS 13.21/4.17 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 31 ms] 13.21/4.17 (2) QDP 13.21/4.17 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 13.21/4.17 (4) QDP 13.21/4.17 (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 94 ms] 13.21/4.17 (6) QDP 13.21/4.17 (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 13.21/4.17 (8) TRUE 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 ---------------------------------------- 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 (0) 13.21/4.17 Obligation: 13.21/4.17 Q restricted rewrite system: 13.21/4.17 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1)) 13.21/4.17 c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1))) 13.21/4.17 c(x1) -> g(x1) 13.21/4.17 d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1)) 13.21/4.17 d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 f(x1) -> a(g(x1)) 13.21/4.17 g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1))) 13.21/4.17 g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 Q is empty. 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 ---------------------------------------- 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 13.21/4.17 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 13.21/4.17 ---------------------------------------- 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 (2) 13.21/4.17 Obligation: 13.21/4.17 Q DP problem: 13.21/4.17 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 B(b(x1)) -> C(d(x1)) 13.21/4.17 B(b(x1)) -> D(x1) 13.21/4.17 C(c(x1)) -> D(d(d(x1))) 13.21/4.17 C(c(x1)) -> D(d(x1)) 13.21/4.17 C(c(x1)) -> D(x1) 13.21/4.17 C(x1) -> G(x1) 13.21/4.17 D(d(x1)) -> C(f(x1)) 13.21/4.17 D(d(x1)) -> F(x1) 13.21/4.17 D(d(d(x1))) -> G(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 D(d(d(x1))) -> C(x1) 13.21/4.17 F(x1) -> G(x1) 13.21/4.17 G(x1) -> D(a(b(x1))) 13.21/4.17 G(x1) -> B(x1) 13.21/4.17 G(g(x1)) -> B(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 G(g(x1)) -> C(x1) 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1)) 13.21/4.17 c(c(x1)) -> d(d(d(x1))) 13.21/4.17 c(x1) -> g(x1) 13.21/4.17 d(d(x1)) -> c(f(x1)) 13.21/4.17 d(d(d(x1))) -> g(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 f(x1) -> a(g(x1)) 13.21/4.17 g(x1) -> d(a(b(x1))) 13.21/4.17 g(g(x1)) -> b(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 Q is empty. 13.21/4.17 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 13.21/4.17 ---------------------------------------- 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 13.21/4.17 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node. 13.21/4.17 ---------------------------------------- 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 (4) 13.21/4.17 Obligation: 13.21/4.17 Q DP problem: 13.21/4.17 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 13.21/4.17 13.21/4.17 C(c(x1)) -> D(d(d(x1))) 13.21/4.17 D(d(x1)) -> C(f(x1)) 13.21/4.17 C(c(x1)) -> D(d(x1)) 13.21/4.17 D(d(x1)) -> F(x1) 13.21/4.17 F(x1) -> G(x1) 13.21/4.17 G(x1) -> B(x1) 13.21/4.17 B(b(x1)) -> C(d(x1)) 13.21/4.17 C(c(x1)) -> D(x1) 13.21/4.17 D(d(d(x1))) -> G(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 G(g(x1)) -> B(c(x1)) 13.21/4.17 B(b(x1)) -> D(x1) 13.21/4.17 D(d(d(x1))) -> C(x1) 13.21/4.17 C(x1) -> G(x1)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29