details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	18.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Bouchare_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	6.73287 seconds
cpu usage	22.9526
user time	21.8157
system time	1.13688
max virtual memory	3.9686192E7
max residence set size	3560928.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

22.58/6.61 YES 22.64/6.63 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 22.64/6.63 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 (0) QTRS 22.64/6.63 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 31 ms] 22.64/6.63 (2) QDP 22.64/6.63 (3) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 137 ms] 22.64/6.63 (4) QDP 22.64/6.63 (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 22.64/6.63 (6) QDP 22.64/6.63 (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 22.64/6.63 (8) QDP 22.64/6.63 (9) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 22.64/6.63 (10) YES 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 ---------------------------------------- 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 (0) 22.64/6.63 Obligation: 22.64/6.63 Q restricted rewrite system: 22.64/6.63 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 a(b(a(x1))) -> b(b(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 b(b(b(x1))) -> b(a(x1)) 22.64/6.63 b(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 Q is empty. 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 ---------------------------------------- 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.64/6.63 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 22.64/6.63 ---------------------------------------- 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 (2) 22.64/6.63 Obligation: 22.64/6.63 Q DP problem: 22.64/6.63 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 A(b(a(x1))) -> B(b(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 B(b(b(x1))) -> B(a(x1)) 22.64/6.63 B(b(b(x1))) -> A(x1) 22.64/6.63 B(b(x1)) -> A(a(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 B(b(x1)) -> A(a(x1)) 22.64/6.63 B(b(x1)) -> A(x1) 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 a(b(a(x1))) -> b(b(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 b(b(b(x1))) -> b(a(x1)) 22.64/6.63 b(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 Q is empty. 22.64/6.63 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 22.64/6.63 ---------------------------------------- 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 (3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.64/6.63 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 A(b(a(x1))) -> B(b(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 22.64/6.63 Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 <<< 22.64/6.63 POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, -I, 1A]] * x_1 22.64/6.63 >>> 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 <<< 22.64/6.63 POL(b(x_1)) = [[-I], [0A], [-I]] + [[0A, -I, 1A], [-I, 0A, -I], [0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 22.64/6.63 >>> 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 <<< 22.64/6.63 POL(a(x_1)) = [[-I], [0A], [-I]] + [[0A, -I, 1A], [-I, -I, -I], [-I, -I, 0A]] * x_1 22.64/6.63 >>> 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 <<< 22.64/6.63 POL(B(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, -I, -I]] * x_1 22.64/6.63 >>> 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 b(b(b(x1))) -> b(a(x1)) 22.64/6.63 b(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 a(b(a(x1))) -> b(b(a(x1))) 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 ---------------------------------------- 22.64/6.63 22.64/6.63 (4) 22.64/6.63 Obligation: 22.64/6.63 Q DP problem: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29