details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-48.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n174.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	7.39138 seconds
cpu usage	24.7946
user time	23.5875
system time	1.20706
max virtual memory	2.09014E7
max residence set size	3527552.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

24.08/7.20 YES 24.45/7.27 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 24.45/7.27 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 (0) QTRS 24.45/7.27 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 12 ms] 24.45/7.27 (2) QDP 24.45/7.27 (3) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 176 ms] 24.45/7.27 (4) QDP 24.45/7.27 (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 24.45/7.27 (6) QDP 24.45/7.27 (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 24.45/7.27 (8) TRUE 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 ---------------------------------------- 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 (0) 24.45/7.27 Obligation: 24.45/7.27 Q restricted rewrite system: 24.45/7.27 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 a(x1) -> x1 24.45/7.27 a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) 24.45/7.27 c(b(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(a(x1)))) 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 Q is empty. 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 ---------------------------------------- 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 24.45/7.27 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 24.45/7.27 ---------------------------------------- 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 (2) 24.45/7.27 Obligation: 24.45/7.27 Q DP problem: 24.45/7.27 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 A(x1) -> C(x1) 24.45/7.27 C(b(b(b(x1)))) -> A(a(x1)) 24.45/7.27 C(b(b(b(x1)))) -> A(x1) 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 a(x1) -> x1 24.45/7.27 a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) 24.45/7.27 c(b(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(a(x1)))) 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 Q is empty. 24.45/7.27 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 24.45/7.27 ---------------------------------------- 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 (3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 24.45/7.27 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 C(b(b(b(x1)))) -> A(x1) 24.45/7.27 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 24.45/7.27 Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 <<< 24.45/7.27 POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 24.45/7.27 >>> 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 <<< 24.45/7.27 POL(C(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 24.45/7.27 >>> 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 <<< 24.45/7.27 POL(b(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [1A]] + [[-I, 0A, -I], [0A, -I, 0A], [1A, 0A, -I]] * x_1 24.45/7.27 >>> 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 <<< 24.45/7.27 POL(a(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [1A]] + [[0A, -I, -I], [0A, 0A, -I], [1A, 1A, 0A]] * x_1 24.45/7.27 >>> 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 <<< 24.45/7.27 POL(c(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [0A]] + [[0A, 0A, -I], [0A, -I, -I], [0A, 0A, -I]] * x_1 24.45/7.27 >>> 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 a(x1) -> x1 24.45/7.27 a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) 24.45/7.27 c(b(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(a(x1)))) 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 ---------------------------------------- 24.45/7.27 24.45/7.27 (4) 24.45/7.27 Obligation: 24.45/7.27 Q DP problem: 24.45/7.27 The TRS P consists of the following rules: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29