details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-282.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n045.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	10.8848 seconds
cpu usage	35.9309
user time	34.506
system time	1.42487
max virtual memory	6.2824912E7
max residence set size	4039800.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

32.13/9.15 YES 35.77/10.66 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 35.77/10.66 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (0) QTRS 35.77/10.66 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 5 ms] 35.77/10.66 (2) QDP 35.77/10.66 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 3 ms] 35.77/10.66 (4) QDP 35.77/10.66 (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 136 ms] 35.77/10.66 (6) QDP 35.77/10.66 (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 35.77/10.66 (8) QDP 35.77/10.66 (9) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 35.77/10.66 (10) YES 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 ---------------------------------------- 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (0) 35.77/10.66 Obligation: 35.77/10.66 Q restricted rewrite system: 35.77/10.66 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 a(x1) -> x1 35.77/10.66 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(a(a(c(x1))))) 35.77/10.66 b(x1) -> x1 35.77/10.66 c(c(x1)) -> b(x1) 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 Q is empty. 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 ---------------------------------------- 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 35.77/10.66 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 35.77/10.66 ---------------------------------------- 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (2) 35.77/10.66 Obligation: 35.77/10.66 Q DP problem: 35.77/10.66 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> C(b(a(a(c(x1))))) 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> B(a(a(c(x1)))) 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> A(a(c(x1))) 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> A(c(x1)) 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> C(x1) 35.77/10.66 C(c(x1)) -> B(x1) 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 a(x1) -> x1 35.77/10.66 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(a(a(c(x1))))) 35.77/10.66 b(x1) -> x1 35.77/10.66 c(c(x1)) -> b(x1) 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 Q is empty. 35.77/10.66 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 35.77/10.66 ---------------------------------------- 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 35.77/10.66 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes. 35.77/10.66 ---------------------------------------- 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (4) 35.77/10.66 Obligation: 35.77/10.66 Q DP problem: 35.77/10.66 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> A(c(x1)) 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> A(a(c(x1))) 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 a(x1) -> x1 35.77/10.66 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(a(a(c(x1))))) 35.77/10.66 b(x1) -> x1 35.77/10.66 c(c(x1)) -> b(x1) 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 Q is empty. 35.77/10.66 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 35.77/10.66 ---------------------------------------- 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 35.77/10.66 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 A(b(x1)) -> A(c(x1)) 35.77/10.66 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 35.77/10.66 Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: 35.77/10.66 35.77/10.66 <<< 35.77/10.66 POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, 0A, -I]] * x_1 35.77/10.66 >>> 35.77/10.66 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29