details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-287.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n087.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	9.24272 seconds
cpu usage	32.6083
user time	31.3359
system time	1.27242
max virtual memory	1.02886512E8
max residence set size	3987056.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

31.95/9.06 YES 32.26/9.09 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 32.26/9.09 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (0) QTRS 32.26/9.09 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 22 ms] 32.26/9.09 (2) QDP 32.26/9.09 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 32.26/9.09 (4) QDP 32.26/9.09 (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 50 ms] 32.26/9.09 (6) QDP 32.26/9.09 (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 32.26/9.09 (8) TRUE 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 ---------------------------------------- 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (0) 32.26/9.09 Obligation: 32.26/9.09 Q restricted rewrite system: 32.26/9.09 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 a(x1) -> x1 32.26/9.09 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(b(x1)))) 32.26/9.09 b(x1) -> a(a(x1)) 32.26/9.09 c(c(x1)) -> x1 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 Q is empty. 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 ---------------------------------------- 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 32.26/9.09 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 32.26/9.09 ---------------------------------------- 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (2) 32.26/9.09 Obligation: 32.26/9.09 Q DP problem: 32.26/9.09 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 A(b(x1)) -> C(b(c(b(x1)))) 32.26/9.09 A(b(x1)) -> B(c(b(x1))) 32.26/9.09 A(b(x1)) -> C(b(x1)) 32.26/9.09 B(x1) -> A(a(x1)) 32.26/9.09 B(x1) -> A(x1) 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 a(x1) -> x1 32.26/9.09 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(b(x1)))) 32.26/9.09 b(x1) -> a(a(x1)) 32.26/9.09 c(c(x1)) -> x1 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 Q is empty. 32.26/9.09 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 32.26/9.09 ---------------------------------------- 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 32.26/9.09 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. 32.26/9.09 ---------------------------------------- 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (4) 32.26/9.09 Obligation: 32.26/9.09 Q DP problem: 32.26/9.09 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 A(b(x1)) -> B(c(b(x1))) 32.26/9.09 B(x1) -> A(a(x1)) 32.26/9.09 B(x1) -> A(x1) 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 a(x1) -> x1 32.26/9.09 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(b(x1)))) 32.26/9.09 b(x1) -> a(a(x1)) 32.26/9.09 c(c(x1)) -> x1 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 Q is empty. 32.26/9.09 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 32.26/9.09 ---------------------------------------- 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 32.26/9.09 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 B(x1) -> A(a(x1)) 32.26/9.09 B(x1) -> A(x1) 32.26/9.09 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 32.26/9.09 Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic integers [ARCTIC,STERNAGEL_THIEMANN_RTA14]: 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 <<< 32.26/9.09 POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-I, -I, 1A]] * x_1 32.26/9.09 >>> 32.26/9.09 32.26/9.09 <<< popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29